Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associatio, et al v. Ernest Conant, et al
| PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATIONS, INC., CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE, FRIENDS OF THE RIVER, SAN FRANCISCO CRAB BOAT OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., THE INSTITUTE FOR FISHERIES RESOURCES and FELIX SMITH |
| ERNEST A. CONANT, Regional Director of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and SAN LUIS & DELTA MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY |
| GRASSLAND WATER DISTRICT |
| 23-15599 |
| April 24, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Environmental Matters |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [12723088] (BLS) [Entered: 05/25/2023 06:12 PM] |
| Filing 6 Added Attorney(s) David S. Frankel for party(s) Appellee Ernest A. Conant Appellee United States Bureau of Reclamation, in case 23-15599. [12717804] (BJK) [Entered: 05/17/2023 02:34 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of David S. Frankel (US Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20530) for Appellees Ernest A. Conant and United States Bureau of Reclamation. Date of service: 05/17/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12717704] [23-15599] (Frankel, David) [Entered: 05/17/2023 01:35 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 05/25/2023, 9:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12716331] (BLS) [Entered: 05/15/2023 05:56 PM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 04/27/2023. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12704263]. [23-15599] (AD) [Entered: 04/27/2023 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, Inc., California Sportfishing Protection Alliance, Friends of the River, San Francisco Crab Boat Owners Association, Inc., Felix Smith and The Institute For Fisheries Resources Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 04/27/2023. [12703985] [23-15599] (Volker, Stephan) [Entered: 04/27/2023 08:45 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants California Sportfishing Protection Alliance, Friends of the River, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, Inc., San Francisco Crab Boat Owners Association, Inc., Felix Smith and The Institute For Fisheries Resources Mediation Questionnaire due on 05/01/2023. Transcript ordered by 05/24/2023. Transcript due 06/22/2023. Appellants California Sportfishing Protection Alliance, Friends of the River, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, Inc., San Francisco Crab Boat Owners Association, Inc., Felix Smith and The Institute For Fisheries Resources opening brief due 07/28/2023. Appellees Ernest A. Conant, Grassland Water District, San Luis & Delta Mendota Water Authority and United States Bureau of Reclamation answering brief due 08/28/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12701844] (RT) [Entered: 04/24/2023 03:36 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
