Cyrus Sanai v. George Cardona, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: CYRUS MARK SANAI
Defendant / Appellee: GEORGE CARDONA and LEAH WILSON
Case Number: 23-15618
Filed: April 26, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 30, 2024 CYRUS SANAI V. GEORGE CARDONA, ET AL

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 6, 2023 Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): Appellants motion for an extension of time to file the opening brief (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ]) is granted. The opening brief is now due June 26, 2023; the answering brief is due July 24, 2023; and the optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12730091] (ABT) [Entered: 06/06/2023 02:48 PM]
June 5, 2023 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Cyrus Mark Sanai Unopposed Motion to extend time to file Opening brief until 06/26/2023. Date of service: 06/05/2023. [12728694] [23-15618] (Sanai, Cyrus) [Entered: 06/05/2023 01:10 PM]
May 12, 2023 Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): The appeal filed April 24, 2023 is a preliminary injunction appeal. Accordingly, Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3 shall apply. The briefing schedule will be established as follows: appellants opening brief is due June 16, 2023; appellees answering brief is due July 14, 2023; and appellants optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. The appeal and any motions pending at the time briefing is completed will be referred to the next available motions panel for disposition. No streamlined extensions of time will be approved. See 9th Cir. R. 31-2.2(a)(3). Any request for an extension of time to file a brief must be made by written motion under Ninth Circuit Rule 31-2.2(b). Failure to file timely the opening brief will result in the automatic dismissal of this appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [12715315] (AF) [Entered: 05/12/2023 05:12 PM]
April 26, 2023 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: To be set. Preliminary Injunction Appeal, C.R. 3-3. [12703281] (JBS) [Entered: 04/26/2023 11:13 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Cyrus Sanai v. George Cardona, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: CYRUS MARK SANAI
Represented By: Cyrus Mark Sanai
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: GEORGE CARDONA
Represented By: Rita Kathryn Himes
Represented By: Robert G. Retana
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: LEAH WILSON
Represented By: Rita Kathryn Himes
Represented By: Robert G. Retana
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?