Douglas Hirano v. Kate McClory, et al
| DOUGLAS AKIRA HIRANO |
| KATE MCCLORY, SAND ISLAND TREATMENT CENTER, AT&T WIRELESS, RANDY LEE COOK, HOLIDAY INN HOTEL, WHITE SANDS HOTEL, SAND VILLA HOTEL, COCONUT WAIKIKI HOTEL, OHANA MALIA HOTEL, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOHN DOES, 1-200 and JANE ROES, 1-100 |
| 23-15620 |
| April 26, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Personal Injury |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 09/27/2023. [12800351] (BY) [Entered: 09/28/2023 07:01 AM] |
| Filing 17 Check number 1084 in the amount of $505.00, forwarded to district court. [12791105] (JR) [Entered: 09/12/2023 04:55 PM] |
| Filing 16 MANDATE ISSUED. (BGS, RDN and PJB) [12777619] (HH) [Entered: 08/21/2023 11:07 AM] |
| Filing 15 Filed order (BARRY G. SILVERMAN, RYAN D. NELSON and PATRICK J. BUMATAY) Upon a review of the record and the responses to the courts May 8, 2023 order to show cause, we conclude this appeal is frivolous. We therefore deny appellants motions to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry Nos. [ # 3 ] and [ # 8 ]), see 28 U.S.C. 1915(a), and dismiss this appeal as frivolous, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) (court shall dismiss case at any time, if court determines it is frivolous or malicious). All other pending motions are denied as moot. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. DISMISSED. [12745250] (ABT) [Entered: 06/28/2023 04:23 PM] |
| Filing 14 Filed Appellant Douglas Akira Hirano motion to extend time to file appellant opening brief until 08/12/2023. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/19/2023. [12743297] (HH) [Entered: 06/26/2023 04:28 PM] |
| Filing 13 Filed Appellant Douglas Akira Hirano Statement that appeal should go forward. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12729814] (HH) [Entered: 06/06/2023 12:41 PM] |
| Filing 12 Filed Appellant Douglas Akira Hirano Statement of issues on appeal. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12716178] (HH) [Entered: 05/15/2023 03:58 PM] |
| Filing 11 Sent: Appellant Douglas Akira Hirano a copy of rules & docket sheet per request. [ # 10 ] [12715095] (ER) [Entered: 05/12/2023 03:21 PM] |
| Filing 10 Filed Appellant Douglas Akira Hirano letter dated 05/05/2023 re: Requesting copy of rules. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12714989] (HH) [Entered: 05/12/2023 02:34 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed Appellant Douglas Akira Hirano motion to appoint counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 05/04/2023. [12712250] (HH) [Entered: 05/09/2023 02:14 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed Appellant Douglas Akira Hirano motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 05/04/2023. [12712247] (HH) [Entered: 05/09/2023 02:13 PM] |
| Filing 7 Sent Appellant a copy of the Informal Brief Form in response to the letter filed on 05/08/2023. [12711294] (JR) [Entered: 05/08/2023 03:51 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Douglas Akira Hirano letter dated 04/28/2023 re: Requesting coy of informal brief form. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12711278] (HH) [Entered: 05/08/2023 03:43 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Douglas Akira Hirano letter dated 04/28/2023 re: Incorrect party listing. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12711273] (HH) [Entered: 05/08/2023 03:41 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): A review of the record reflects that this appeal may be frivolous. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), OR (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellees may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. The briefing schedule for this appeal remains stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss this appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [12710478] (AF) [Entered: 05/08/2023 09:07 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Douglas Akira Hirano motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 04/19/2023. [12706195] (HH) [Entered: 05/01/2023 01:31 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12703489] (CKP) [Entered: 04/26/2023 01:34 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Douglas Akira Hirano opening brief due 06/28/2023. Appellees AT&T Wireless, Coconut Waikiki Hotel, Randy Lee Cook, Holiday Inn Hotel, Jane Roes, John Does, Kate McClory, Ohana Malia Hotel, Sand Island Treatment Center, Sand Villa Hotel, United States of America and White Sands Hotel answering brief due 07/28/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12703300] (RT) [Entered: 04/26/2023 11:26 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
