Weslie Martin v. Efrain Lona, et al
| MARK DUBREE, B. WILLIAMS, Warden, J. DZURENDA, Director, WILLIAM WHARTON and NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
| WESLIE MARTIN |
| EFRAIN LONA, Officer |
| 23-15653 |
| May 2, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed Appellee Weslie Martin reply to appellants response to order to show cause and motion to extend. Not dated. [12743235] (RL) [Entered: 06/26/2023 03:56 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Efrain Lona response to order to show cause dated 05/11/2023. Date of service: 06/13/2023. [12735086] [23-15653] (Davis, Chris) [Entered: 06/13/2023 02:56 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Efrain Lona Motion to extend time to comply with the order dated 05/11/2023. Date of service: 06/13/2023. [12735082] [23-15653] (Davis, Chris) [Entered: 06/13/2023 02:54 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal may not be final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Ballou v. McElvain, 29 F.4th 413, 421 (9th Cir. 2022) (noting that this courts jurisdiction over an interlocutory appeal from the denial of qualified immunity at summary judgment is limited to the question of whether the defendant would be entitled to qualified immunity as a matter of law, assuming all factual disputes are resolved, and all reasonable inferences are drawn, in plaintiffs favor (citing Estate of Anderson v. Marsh, 985 F.3d 726, 731 (9th Cir. 2021))). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall either move for voluntary dismissal of this appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [12714251] (OC) [Entered: 05/11/2023 03:21 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT AND PRO SE APPELLEE. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 05/31/2023. Transcript due 06/30/2023. Appellant Efrain Lona opening brief due 08/09/2023. Appellee Weslie Martin answering brief due 09/11/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12707074] (RT) [Entered: 05/02/2023 11:14 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
