Damian Ayarzagoitia v. CoreCivic Corporation, et al
| DAMIAN AYARZAGOITIA |
| CORECIVIC CORPORATION and GERARD BAKER, Correctional Counselor at Saguaro Correctional Center |
| 23-15669 |
| May 4, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MANDATE ISSUED. (JHN, MTF and JS) [12743717] (QDL) [Entered: 06/27/2023 10:52 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed original and 6 copies of Appellant Damian Ayarzagoitia opening brief of 6 pages (Informal: No). Served on 05/26/2023. (case closed) [12734044] (KT) [Entered: 06/12/2023 03:04 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed order (JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN, MICHELLE T. FRIEDLAND and JENNIFER SUNG) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the April 20, 2023 order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12727811] (ABT) [Entered: 06/02/2023 03:33 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Damian Ayarzagoitia letter dated 05/11/2023 re: Request for copy of rules. Paper filing deficiency: None. (Sent appellant copy of rules.) [12716894] (QDL) [Entered: 05/16/2023 01:34 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES.. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Damian Ayarzagoitia opening brief due 06/30/2023 [12708893] (ABT) [Entered: 05/04/2023 11:52 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
