Timothy Olmos v. Michael Cimino, et al
| TIMOTHY PAUL OLMOS, named as Timothy Olmos |
| MICHAEL CIMINO, named as Chief Probation Officer, Maricopa County Adult Probation Department, ERWINN PRIETO, Probation Officer, Maricopa County Adult Probation Department, originally named as Edwin Prieto, changed per [9], ARMIDA HERNANDEZ, Surveillance Officer, Maricopa County Adult Probation Department, ARNI COOK, BRADY HAMMER, Surveillance Officer, Maricopa County Adult Probation Department, PAUL PENZONE, Maricopa County Sheriff, FRANK MILSTEAD, Director, Arizona Department of Public Safety, PSYCHOLOGICAL & CONSULTING SERVICES, contractor retained by Maricopa County Adult Probation Department, BRECKEN BLADES, named as Doctor, employee of Psychological & Consulting Services, ANDREA ROMANO, Probation Officer Supervisor, JOCELYN MYERS, Probation Officer Supervisor, AMANDA COPCIAC, Probation Officer, JEFF GALLIMORE, Surveillance Officer and DOUG DUCEY, Governor of the State of Arizona |
| 23-15685 |
| May 8, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed order (MARY M. SCHROEDER and JOHN B. OWENS) Appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. [ # 5 ]) is granted. Appellants request for revisions to the prisoner authorization forms and other relief is denied. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1) and (2), appellant eventually must pay the full amount of the filing and docketing fees for this appeal. Accordingly, within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall complete and file with this court the enclosed prisoner authorization form, which directs the prison officials at appellants institution to assess, collect, and forward to the court the $505.00 filing and docketing fees for this appeal on a monthly basis whenever funds exist in appellants trust fund account. These fees will continue to be collected regardless of the date or manner of disposition of this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2), (e)(2). If appellant fails to comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The opening brief is due October 2, 2023; the answering brief is due November 1, 2023; and the optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. Because appellant is proceeding without counsel, appellant is not required to file excerpts of record. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1.3. If appellant does not file excerpts of record, appellees must file Supplemental Excerpts of Record that contain all of the documents that are cited in the pro se opening brief or otherwise required by Rule 30-1.4, as well as the documents that are cited in the answering brief. See id. The Clerk shall serve this order and a prisoner authorization form on appellant. [12779152] (JMR) [Entered: 08/22/2023 04:49 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Timothy Paul Olmos letter dated 08/01/2023 requesting copy of docket sheet; sent today. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12769403] (BJK) [Entered: 08/07/2023 01:01 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed Appellant Timothy Paul Olmos motion to extend time to file appellant opening brief until 11/20/2023. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/30/2023. [12782121] (BJK) [Entered: 08/28/2023 04:24 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Timothy Paul Olmos motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. [Case caption lists different case number, but Form 4 has correct case number.]Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/30/2023. [12751414] (BJK) [Entered: 07/10/2023 09:58 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): Appellants May 23, 2023 motion for an extension of time [ # 3 ] in which to file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. On or before July 5, 2023, appellant must file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, accompanied by a completed Form 4 financial affidavit. The filing of a motion to proceed in forma pauperis will automatically stay the briefing schedule under Ninth Circuit Rule 27-11. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the appeal will be dismissed automatically by the Clerk under Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is stayed pending further order of the court. [12725577] (CKP) [Entered: 05/31/2023 12:04 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Timothy Paul Olmos motion to extend time to comply with the order dated 05/10/2023. Deficiencies: None. Served on 05/17/2023. [12721813] (BJK) [Entered: 05/24/2023 11:12 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): Order to show cause docket fee due [12713272] (CKP) [Entered: 05/10/2023 02:56 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Timothy Paul Olmos opening brief due 07/03/2023. Appellees Brecken Blades, Michael Cimino, Arni Cook, Amanda Copciac, Doug Ducey, Jeff Gallimore, Brady Hammer, Armida Hernandez, Frank Milstead, Jocelyn Myers, Paul Penzone, Erwinn Prieto, Psychological & Consulting Services and Andrea Romano answering brief due 08/02/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12710653] (ABT) [Entered: 05/08/2023 10:42 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
