Chad Bourne v. Rookies, Inc.
| CHAD BOURNE |
| ROOKIES, INC., DBA Rookie's Sports Bar and Grill |
| 23-15700 |
| May 9, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Americans w/Disabilities Act-Empl |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Streamlined request [7] by Appellant Chad Bourne to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Chad Bourne opening brief due 08/07/2023. Appellee Rookies, Inc. answering brief due 09/06/2023. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12750118] (BG) [Entered: 07/06/2023 04:07 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Chad Bourne. New requested due date is 08/04/2023. [12750053] [23-15700] (Burke, Steven) [Entered: 07/06/2023 03:25 PM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION STATUS REPORT DUE - 07/10/2023. See order for details. [12746233] (CL) [Entered: 06/29/2023 05:17 PM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference w/ counsel for appellant only, 06/21/2023, 10:30 a.m. Pacific Time. See order for details. [12733812] (CL) [Entered: 06/12/2023 01:04 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 06/12/2023, 11:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12726120] (CL) [Entered: 05/31/2023 06:00 PM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 05/16/2023. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12716827]. [23-15700] (AD) [Entered: 05/16/2023 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Chad Bourne Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 05/16/2023. [12716648] [23-15700] (Burke, Steven) [Entered: 05/16/2023 10:15 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Chad Bourne Mediation Questionnaire due on 05/16/2023. Appellant Chad Bourne opening brief due 07/07/2023. Appellee Rookies, Inc. answering brief due 08/07/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12712283] (JMR) [Entered: 05/09/2023 02:28 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Chad Bourne v. Rookies, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: CHAD BOURNE | |
| Represented By: | Steven Burke |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: ROOKIES, INC., DBA Rookie's Sports Bar and Grill | |
| Represented By: | Joshua A. Sliker Esquire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
