Ricky-Dean Horton v. PG&E Corporation
RICKY-DEAN HORTON |
PG&E CORPORATION |
23-15716 |
May 10, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): Order to show cause docket fee due [12714113] (CKP) [Entered: 05/11/2023 02:13 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Ricky-Dean Horton opening brief due 07/10/2023. Appellee PG&E Corporation answering brief due 08/10/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12713423] (RT) [Entered: 05/10/2023 04:16 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Ricky-Dean Horton v. PG&E Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: RICKY-DEAN HORTON | |
Represented By: | Ricky-Dean Horton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: PG&E CORPORATION | |
Represented By: | Peter J. Benvenutti Esquire |
Represented By: | Jane Kim |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.