Anjali Ward v. Judith Lawrence, et al
| ANJALI WARD |
| JUDITH LAWRENCE, CHAU NGUYEN, MARK ROBISON, LEI XU, ROSLYN GENTRY, KELLIE CASE, DANIEL DANSIE, TANYA FAIRCLOUGH, REBECCA C. HARDIE, ACACIA CHIDI, NOEL SIDNEY PLUMMER, JANICE L. AMENTA and CHRYSTAL GABRIEL |
| 23-15790 |
| May 24, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court. [12756609] (BJK) [Entered: 07/17/2023 04:00 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): Motion to dismiss case for failure to prosecute (Cir. Rule 42-1). Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1, this appeal is dismissed for failure to respond to order. (Order dated 05/31/2023). This order served on the district court shall, 21 days after the date of the order, act as the mandate of this court. [12751718] (CKP) [Entered: 07/10/2023 12:28 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court revoked appellants in forma pauperis status for this appeal because it found that the appeal was frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellee may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [12725597] (CKP) [Entered: 05/31/2023 12:18 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Anjali Ward opening brief due 07/17/2023. Appellees Janice L. Amenta, Kellie Case, Acacia Chidi, Daniel Dansie, Tanya Fairclough, Chrystal Gabriel, Roslyn Gentry, Rebecca C. Hardie, Judith Lawrence, Chau Nguyen, Noel Sidney Plummer, Mark Robison and Lei Xu answering brief due 08/16/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12721704] (ABT) [Entered: 05/24/2023 10:12 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
