Matthew Houston v. L.B.B.S., et al
| MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON |
| L.B.B.S., Termed by ECF No. 5, DANIEL SCHWARTZ, CALVIN JOHNSON, JOE LOMBARDO, METRO-GOLDWYN-MAYER, INC., Termed by ECF No. 5, MANDALAY BAY CORP., Termed by ECF No. 5, BRIAN P. CLARK, GOLDEN ENTERTAINMENT, Termed by ECF No. 5, SEDGWICK, Termed by ECF No. 5, LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, Termed by ECF No. 5, ROSEMARIE MCMORRIS-ALEXANDER, Added by ECF No. 5, REDENTA BLACIC, Added by ECF No. 5, JONATHAN SHOCKLEY, Added by ECF No. 5, CAROLYN GOODMAN, Added by ECF No. 5, MIRANDA M. DU, Added by ECF No. 5, DAVID M. JONES, Added by ECF No. 5 and TIERRA DANIELLE JONES, Added by ECF No. 5 |
| 23-15810 |
| May 26, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): A review of the record reflects that this appeal may be frivolous. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), OR (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The briefing schedule for this appeal remains stayed. The Clerk will serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss this appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [12759876] (AF) [Entered: 07/21/2023 05:09 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed Appellant Matthew Travis Houston EMERGENCY motion for recusals. Deficiencies: None. [12749061] (NAC) [Entered: 07/05/2023 02:39 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed Appellant Matthew Travis Houston motion for oral argument. Deficiencies: None. [12749013] (NAC) [Entered: 07/05/2023 02:24 PM] |
| Filing 7 Received Appellant Matthew Travis Houston copy of District Court application to proceed In Forma Pauperis. [12748777] (NAC) [Entered: 07/05/2023 12:42 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Matthew Travis Houston miscellaneous motion. Deficiencies: None. [12748556] (NAC) [Entered: 07/05/2023 10:12 AM] |
| Filing 5 Streamlined request by Appellant Matthew Travis Houston to extend time to file the brief is not approved because it is unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed. Briefing shall be reset as necessary upon the resolution of the pending motions to appoint pro bono counsel and to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Dockets [3,4].See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. [12744081] (DLM) [Entered: 06/27/2023 02:59 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Matthew Travis Houston motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [12743505] (NAC) [Entered: 06/27/2023 07:14 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Matthew Travis Houston motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. [12743504] (NAC) [Entered: 06/27/2023 07:11 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): Order to show cause docket fee due [12727782] (CKP) [Entered: 06/02/2023 03:18 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Matthew Travis Houston opening brief due 07/24/2023. [12723642] (ABT) [Entered: 05/26/2023 03:01 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
