Helen Le v. USPS, et al
| HELEN LE |
| UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, CEO, Director, Supervisor and SCOTT S. HARRIS, Clerk at Supreme Court of US |
| 23-15816 |
| May 30, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Filed Appellant Ms. Helen Le letter dated 07/25/2023 re: Petition to return documents and to reopen cases. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12762675] (HH) [Entered: 07/26/2023 01:13 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed Appellant Ms. Helen Le Petition to grant default for final judgment. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12753977] (HH) [Entered: 07/12/2023 02:46 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed Appellant Ms. Helen Le Statement that appeal should go forward. Served on 07/12/2023. [12753974] (HH) [Entered: 07/12/2023 02:44 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant Ms. Helen Le "Order motion for petition mandate for rehearing... " Deficiencies: None. [12749251] (HH) [Entered: 07/05/2023 04:05 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is frivolous and not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [12743821] (CKP) [Entered: 06/27/2023 11:42 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Ms. Helen Le motion to "Compel to extraordinary writ mandamus." Deficiencies: None. Served on. [12739285] (HH) [Entered: 06/20/2023 02:47 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Ms. Helen Le motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/18/2023. [12739280] (HH) [Entered: 06/20/2023 02:45 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Ms. Helen Le motion to reopen and set hearing. Deficiencies: None. [12734899] (HH) [Entered: 06/13/2023 12:53 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk: MCD: Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [12725637] (CKP) [Entered: 05/31/2023 12:33 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Helen Le opening brief due 07/25/2023. [12724332] (JMR) [Entered: 05/30/2023 11:35 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
