Gallagher & Kennedy, P.A. v. City of Phoenix, et al
GALLAGHER & KENNEDY, P.A. |
CITY OF PHOENIX, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, COUNTY OF MARICOPA, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona and PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY, a California corporation |
23-15938 |
June 28, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Environmental Matters |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [12761165] (BLS) [Entered: 07/24/2023 06:22 PM] |
Filing 11 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 07/24/2023, 11:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12756196] (BLS) [Entered: 07/17/2023 11:44 AM] |
Filing 10 Deleted Incorrect Entry. [12755934] (BLS) [Entered: 07/17/2023 07:59 AM] |
Filing 9 Added Attorney Christopher David Thomas for Appellee City of Phoenix, in case 23-15938. [12752861] (HH) [Entered: 07/11/2023 12:27 PM] |
Filing 8 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Christopher D. Thomas (Perkins Coie LLP, 2901 North Central Avenue, Suite 2000, Phoenix, AZ 85012) for Appellee City of Phoenix. Date of service: 07/11/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12752855] [23-15938] (Thomas, Christopher) [Entered: 07/11/2023 12:18 PM] |
Filing 7 Added Attorney John L. Condrey for Appellee Prudential Overall Supply, in case 23-15938. [12751763] (HH) [Entered: 07/10/2023 01:07 PM] |
Filing 6 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of John L. Condrey (Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP, Two North Central Avenue, Suite 2200, Phoenix, AZ 85004) for Appellee Prudential Overall Supply. Date of service: 07/10/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12751733] [23-15938] (Condrey, John) [Entered: 07/10/2023 12:38 PM] |
Filing 5 Added Attorney(s) William Pearson for party(s) Appellee County of Maricopa, in case 23-15938. [12751067] (JFF) [Entered: 07/07/2023 04:49 PM] |
Filing 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of William W. Pearson (Pearson Law Group LLC, 3509 E. Shea Blvd., Ste.117, Phoenix, AZ 85028) for Appellee County of Maricopa. Date of service: 07/07/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12750942] [23-15938] (Pearson, William) [Entered: 07/07/2023 03:41 PM] |
Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 07/03/2023. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12748332]. [23-15938] (AD) [Entered: 07/03/2023 06:44 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Gallagher & Kennedy, P.A. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 07/03/2023. [12748036] [23-15938] (Dangerfield, Mark) [Entered: 07/03/2023 01:21 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Gallagher & Kennedy, P.A. Mediation Questionnaire due on 07/05/2023. Transcript ordered by 07/27/2023. Transcript due 08/28/2023. Appellant Gallagher & Kennedy, P.A. opening brief due 10/05/2023. Appellees City of Phoenix, County of Maricopa and Prudential Overall Supply answering brief due 11/06/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12744856] (JBS) [Entered: 06/28/2023 01:06 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.