Gallagher & Kennedy, P.A. v. City of Phoenix, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: GALLAGHER & KENNEDY, P.A.
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF PHOENIX, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, COUNTY OF MARICOPA, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona and PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY, a California corporation
Case Number: 23-15938
Filed: June 28, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 24, 2023 Filing 12 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [12761165] (BLS) [Entered: 07/24/2023 06:22 PM]
July 17, 2023 Filing 11 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 07/24/2023, 11:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12756196] (BLS) [Entered: 07/17/2023 11:44 AM]
July 17, 2023 Filing 10 Deleted Incorrect Entry. [12755934] (BLS) [Entered: 07/17/2023 07:59 AM]
July 11, 2023 Filing 9 Added Attorney Christopher David Thomas for Appellee City of Phoenix, in case 23-15938. [12752861] (HH) [Entered: 07/11/2023 12:27 PM]
July 11, 2023 Filing 8 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Christopher D. Thomas (Perkins Coie LLP, 2901 North Central Avenue, Suite 2000, Phoenix, AZ 85012) for Appellee City of Phoenix. Date of service: 07/11/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12752855] [23-15938] (Thomas, Christopher) [Entered: 07/11/2023 12:18 PM]
July 10, 2023 Filing 7 Added Attorney John L. Condrey for Appellee Prudential Overall Supply, in case 23-15938. [12751763] (HH) [Entered: 07/10/2023 01:07 PM]
July 10, 2023 Filing 6 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of John L. Condrey (Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP, Two North Central Avenue, Suite 2200, Phoenix, AZ 85004) for Appellee Prudential Overall Supply. Date of service: 07/10/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12751733] [23-15938] (Condrey, John) [Entered: 07/10/2023 12:38 PM]
July 7, 2023 Filing 5 Added Attorney(s) William Pearson for party(s) Appellee County of Maricopa, in case 23-15938. [12751067] (JFF) [Entered: 07/07/2023 04:49 PM]
July 7, 2023 Filing 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of William W. Pearson (Pearson Law Group LLC, 3509 E. Shea Blvd., Ste.117, Phoenix, AZ 85028) for Appellee County of Maricopa. Date of service: 07/07/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12750942] [23-15938] (Pearson, William) [Entered: 07/07/2023 03:41 PM]
July 3, 2023 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 07/03/2023. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12748332]. [23-15938] (AD) [Entered: 07/03/2023 06:44 PM]
July 3, 2023 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Gallagher & Kennedy, P.A. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 07/03/2023. [12748036] [23-15938] (Dangerfield, Mark) [Entered: 07/03/2023 01:21 PM]
June 28, 2023 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Gallagher & Kennedy, P.A. Mediation Questionnaire due on 07/05/2023. Transcript ordered by 07/27/2023. Transcript due 08/28/2023. Appellant Gallagher & Kennedy, P.A. opening brief due 10/05/2023. Appellees City of Phoenix, County of Maricopa and Prudential Overall Supply answering brief due 11/06/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12744856] (JBS) [Entered: 06/28/2023 01:06 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Gallagher & Kennedy, P.A. v. City of Phoenix, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: GALLAGHER & KENNEDY, P.A.
Represented By: Mark C. Dangerfield Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CITY OF PHOENIX, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona
Represented By: Andrea J. Driggs Esquire
Represented By: Barry G. Stratford
Represented By: Christopher David Thomas Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: COUNTY OF MARICOPA, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona
Represented By: Maxine S. Mak Esquire
Represented By: William Pearson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY, a California corporation
Represented By: John L. Condrey Esquire
Represented By: Andrew S. Jacob Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?