Daniel Barrera, et al v. David Krause, et al
Plaintiff: M. P., through her guardian ad litem Janet Palomino and M. B., through her guardian ad litem Jessica McGee
Defendant: CITY OF WOODLAND and DAN BELLINI, Former Police Chief
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANIEL BARRERA and CHRISTINE AMARO
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID KRAUSE, Sergeant, THOMAS DAVIS, Sergeant, PARVEEN LAL, Officer, RICHARD WRIGHT, Officer and HANNAH GRAY, Officer
Case Number: 23-15981
Filed: July 10, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 3, 2023 Filing 11 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): The dial-in telephone assessment conference previously scheduled for August 3, 2023, is canceled. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties (Docket Entry No. [ # 10 ]), this appeal is voluntarily dismissed. Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal A copy of this order shall serve as and for the mandate of this court. (COURT UPDATE: Attached PDF of the order; 8/8/2023 by AF) [12767768] (JMR) [Entered: 08/03/2023 04:05 PM]
July 31, 2023 Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellants Daniel Barrera and Christine Amaro Joint Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 07/31/2023. [12765025] [23-15981] (Seabaugh, Thomas) [Entered: 07/31/2023 01:17 PM]
July 19, 2023 Filing 9 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): A district court order is not appealable under 28 U.S.C. 1291 unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or unless judgment is entered in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). Romoland Sch. Dist. v. Inland Empire Energy Ctr., LLC, 548 F.3d 738, 747 (9th Cir. 2008) (citing Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981)); see also 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). This court may therefore lack jurisdiction over this appeal. Within 21 days, appellants must either file a statement explaining why the appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction or move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal. If appellants do not comply with this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal under Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. If appellants file a statement, a response may be filed within 10 days. Briefing is stayed. [12757743] (JMR) [Entered: 07/19/2023 08:49 AM]
July 18, 2023 Filing 8 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 07/18/2023. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12757671]. [23-15981] (AD) [Entered: 07/18/2023 06:44 PM]
July 18, 2023 Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellees David Krause, Thomas Davis, Parveen Lal, Richard Wright and Hannah Gray Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 07/18/2023. [12757516] [23-15981] (Whitesides, John) [Entered: 07/18/2023 03:53 PM]
July 18, 2023 Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 08/03/2023, 11:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12757508] (CL) [Entered: 07/18/2023 03:49 PM]
July 18, 2023 Filing 5 Added Attorney John A. Whitesides for party(s) Appellee Parveen Lal, Hannah Gray, Thomas Davis David Krause and Richard Wright, in case 23-15981. [12757491] (BJK) [Entered: 07/18/2023 03:42 PM]
July 18, 2023 Filing 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of John A. Whitesides (Angelo, Kilday & Kilduff, LLP, 601 University Ave., Ste 150, Sacramento, CA 95825) for Appellees David Krause, Parveen Lal, Richard Wright, Hannah Gray and Thomas Davis. Date of service: 07/18/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12756885] [23-15981] (Whitesides, John) [Entered: 07/18/2023 09:26 AM]
July 17, 2023 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 07/17/2023. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12756763]. [23-15981] (AD) [Entered: 07/17/2023 06:44 PM]
July 17, 2023 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Christine Amaro and Daniel Barrera Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 07/17/2023. [12756326] [23-15981] (Seabaugh, Thomas) [Entered: 07/17/2023 01:28 PM]
July 10, 2023 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Christine Amaro and Daniel Barrera Mediation Questionnaire due on 07/17/2023. Transcript ordered by 08/09/2023. Transcript due 09/08/2023. Appellants Christine Amaro and Daniel Barrera opening brief due 10/16/2023. Appellees Thomas Davis, Hannah Gray, David Krause, Parveen Lal and Richard Wright answering brief due 11/16/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12752001] (RT) [Entered: 07/10/2023 03:01 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Daniel Barrera, et al v. David Krause, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: DANIEL BARRERA
Represented By: Neil Kamal Gehlawat Esquire
Represented By: Thomas Carter Seabaugh
Represented By: John C. Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: CHRISTINE AMARO
Represented By: Neil Kamal Gehlawat Esquire
Represented By: Thomas Carter Seabaugh
Represented By: John C. Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: M. P., through her guardian ad litem Janet Palomino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: M. B., through her guardian ad litem Jessica McGee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DAVID KRAUSE, Sergeant
Represented By: Bruce A. Kilday
Represented By: Derick Konz
Represented By: John A. Whitesides Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: THOMAS DAVIS, Sergeant
Represented By: Bruce A. Kilday
Represented By: Derick Konz
Represented By: John A. Whitesides Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PARVEEN LAL, Officer
Represented By: Bruce A. Kilday
Represented By: Derick Konz
Represented By: John A. Whitesides Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: RICHARD WRIGHT, Officer
Represented By: Bruce A. Kilday
Represented By: Derick Konz
Represented By: John A. Whitesides Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: HANNAH GRAY, Officer
Represented By: Bruce A. Kilday
Represented By: Derick Konz
Represented By: John A. Whitesides Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITY OF WOODLAND
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DAN BELLINI, Former Police Chief
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?