Narciso Fuentes v. Dish Network, LLC
NARCISO FUENTES, individually , on behalf of others similarly situated, and on behalf of the general public |
DISH NETWORK, LLC |
23-15989 |
July 12, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other Fraud |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Added Attorney(s) Laura Seegal for party(s) Appellant Dish Network, LLC. [12759109] [23-15865, 23-15989] (RL) [Entered: 07/20/2023 04:04 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Laura R. Seegal (Coblentz Patch Duffy & Bass; One Montgomery Street, Suite 3000; San Francisco, CA 94104) for Appellee Dish Network, LLC in 23-15865, Appellant Dish Network, LLC in 23-15989. Date of service: 07/20/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12759101] [23-15865, 23-15989] (Seegal, Laura) [Entered: 07/20/2023 04:00 PM] |
Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellee Dish Network, LLC in 23-15865 Correspondence: Ninth Circuit Rule 10-3.1(c). Date of service: 07/20/2023 [12759005] [23-15865, 23-15989] (Yin, Clifford) [Entered: 07/20/2023 02:54 PM] |
Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 07/19/2023. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12758478]. [23-15989] (AD) [Entered: 07/19/2023 06:44 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Dish Network, LLC in 23-15989, Appellee Dish Network, LLC in 23-15865 Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 07/19/2023. [12758356] [23-15989, 23-15865] (Patch, Richard) [Entered: 07/19/2023 03:42 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. Setting cross-appeal briefing schedule as follows: Appellant Dish Network, LLC Mediation Questionnaire due on 07/19/2023. First cross appeal brief due 09/18/2023 for Narciso Fuentes. Second brief on cross appeal due 10/17/2023 for Dish Network, LLC. Third brief on cross appeal due 11/17/2023 for Narciso Fuentes. Optional cross appeal Reply brief for Dish Network, LLC is due within 21 days of service of Third brief on cross appeal. [12754032] [23-15989, 23-15865] (RT) [Entered: 07/12/2023 03:30 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Narciso Fuentes v. Dish Network, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: NARCISO FUENTES, individually , on behalf of others similarly situated, and on behalf of the general public | |
Represented By: | Elliot Jason Conn |
Represented By: | Arthur David Levy Esquire |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: DISH NETWORK, LLC | |
Represented By: | Richard R. Patch Esquire |
Represented By: | Clifford Yin |
Represented By: | Laura Seegal |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.