Tatyana Drevaleva v. Alameda Health System, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: TATYANA EVGENIEVNA DREVALEVA
Defendant / Appellee: ALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM and CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS
Case Number: 23-16053
Filed: August 1, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 28, 2023 Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant Tatyana Evgenievna Drevaleva EMERGENCY Motion to extend time to file Opening brief until 10/30/2023. Date of service: 09/28/2023. [12801120] [23-16053] (Drevaleva, Tatyana) [Entered: 09/28/2023 10:59 PM]
September 5, 2023 Filing 5 Streamlined request [4] by Appellant Tatyana Evgenievna Drevaleva to extend time to file the brief is not approved because it is unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed pending further order of the court. See 9th Cir. R. 32-2. [12786521] (DR) [Entered: 09/05/2023 01:43 PM]
September 3, 2023 Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Tatyana Evgenievna Drevaleva. New requested due date is 10/30/2023. [12785966] [23-16053] (Drevaleva, Tatyana) [Entered: 09/03/2023 08:00 PM]
August 11, 2023 Filing 3 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 08/11/2023. [12772682] (HH) [Entered: 08/11/2023 12:20 PM]
August 3, 2023 Filing 2 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner): The notice of appeal filed July 30, 2023, challenges the district courts judgment entered on July 7, 2022, and the district courts post-judgment orders entered on July 10, 2023. Appellant previously appealed the district courts judgment entered on July 7, 2022. The portion of this appeal challenging the district courts judgment entered on July 7, 2022 is therefore dismissed as duplicative of closed appeal No. 22-16150. The scope of this appeal is limited to a review of the district courts post-judgment orders entered on July 10, 2023 A review of this courts docket reflects that the filing and docketing fees for this appeal remain due. Within 21 days of this order, appellant must pay to the district court the $505.00 filing and docket ing fees for this appeal and file in this court proof of payment or file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. A review of the record also suggests that the questions raised in this appeal of the district courts July 10, 2023, post-judgment orders are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. Accordingly, within 21 days of this order, appellant must move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause in writing why the appeal should not be either summarily affirmed affirmed, or dismissed as frivolous See United States v. Hooton , 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (stating standard for summary affirmance)); see also 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). If appellant elects to show cause, appellee appellees may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants memorandum memorandum. Failure to fully comply with this order will result in dismissal of this appeal by the Clerk. See 9th Cir. R. 42 1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. The Clerk will serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal appeal; (2) a Form 4 financial affidavit; and ( 3) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss this appeal appeal, motion to proceed in forma pauperis, or statement in response to the courts order to show cause why the appeal should not be either summarily affirmed affirmed, or dismissed as frivolous. [12767374] (OC) [Entered: 08/03/2023 11:04 AM]
August 1, 2023 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Tatyana Evgenievna Drevaleva opening brief due 09/28/2023. Appellees Alameda Health System and California Department of Industrial Relations answering brief due 10/30/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12765728] (JBS) [Entered: 08/01/2023 10:42 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Tatyana Drevaleva v. Alameda Health System, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: TATYANA EVGENIEVNA DREVALEVA
Represented By: Tatyana Evgenievna Drevaleva
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM
Represented By: Timothy Travelstead Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS
Represented By: Lydia Vanessa Ko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?