Aleta Guthrey, et al v. Alta California Regional Center, et al
| ALETA GUTHREY, a conserved adult, through her conservator, Areta Guthrey, ARETA GUTHREY, Conservator and ARETA KAY GUTHREY, Conservator |
| ALTA CALIFORNIA REGIONAL CENTER, a California Non-Profit corporation, ON MY OWN INDEPENDENT LIVING SERVICES, INC., a California corporation, MARY MCGLADE, MICHELLE RAMIREZ, S.T.E.P., INC., a California corporation and TAMMY SMITH |
| 23-16056 |
| August 2, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Americans w/Disabilities Act-Othr |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Appellees S.T.E.P., Inc. and Tammy Smith Motion for miscellaneous relief [Motion to amend case caption]. Date of service: 09/25/2023. [12798944] --[COURT ENTERED FILING to correct entry [8] .] (TYL) [Entered: 09/26/2023 09:02 AM] |
| Filing 8 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 9 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Appellees S.T.E.P., Inc. and Tammy Smith Correspondence: Declaration of Attorney Laura Neacato in support of the removal of Defendant Tammy Smith as a party. Defendant was previously dismissed in the Eastern District Court case.. Date of service: 09/25/2023 [12798737] [23-16056] (Riddell, Jonathan) [Entered: 09/25/2023 05:07 PM] |
| Filing 7 Added Attorney(s) Laura Neacato for party(s) Appellee Tammy Smith Appellee S.T.E.P., Inc.. [12793113] (RL) [Entered: 09/15/2023 11:23 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Laura A. Neacato (Delfino Madden O'Malley Coyle & Koewler, 500 Capitol Mall, Suite 1550, Sacramento, CA 95814) for Appellees S.T.E.P., Inc. and Tammy Smith. Date of service: 09/15/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12793108] [23-16056] (Neacato, Laura) [Entered: 09/15/2023 11:20 AM] |
| Filing 5 Streamlined request [4] by Appellants Aleta Guthrey and Areta Kay Guthrey to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellants Aleta Guthrey and Areta Kay Guthrey opening brief due 11/01/2023. Appellees Alta California Regional Center, Mary McGlade, On My Own Independent Living Services, Inc., Michelle Ramirez, S.T.E.P., Inc. and Tammy Smith answering brief due 12/01/2023. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12788283] (DR) [Entered: 09/07/2023 01:33 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellants Aleta Guthrey and Areta Kay Guthrey. New requested due date is 11/01/2023. [12788016] [23-16056] (Murphy, George) [Entered: 09/07/2023 09:58 AM] |
| Filing 3 Added Attorney(s) George E. Murphy for party(s) Appellant Aleta Guthrey Appellant Areta Kay Guthrey. [12787991] (RL) [Entered: 09/07/2023 09:46 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of George Edson Murphy (George Murphy Legal Services, PC 13341 W. U.S. Highway 290, Bldg. 2 Austin, Texas 78737) for Appellants Aleta Guthrey and Areta Guthrey. Date of service: 09/06/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12787799] [23-16056] (Murphy, George) [Entered: 09/06/2023 06:30 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPEALLANTS. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Aleta Guthrey and Areta Guthrey opening brief due 10/02/2023. Appellees Alta California Regional Center, Mary McGlade, On My Own Independent Living Services, Inc., Michelle Ramirez, S.T.E.P., Inc. and Tammy Smith answering brief due 11/02/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12766751] (RT) [Entered: 08/02/2023 01:21 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
