Gene Scott, II v. USDA, et al
| GENE EDWARD SCOTT II |
| UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE and UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as ARBA, U.S. Gaming Comm. |
| 23-16058 |
| August 2, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): A review of appellants filings in this court reflect that appellant requests dismissal of this appeal in favor of appellant pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, not voluntary dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). Appellants motion for voluntary dismissal of this appeal (Docket Entry No No. [ # 4 ]) is therefore denied. If appellant wishes to dismiss this appeal voluntarily, he m may submit a new motion for voluntary dismissal requesting dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b) on this courts form, without alterations. Appellant has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in response to the courts August 4, 2023 order, but has not filed a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant must file a statement in compliance with the August 4, 2023 order. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The Clerk will serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. [12790117] (OC) [Entered: 09/11/2023 03:45 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Gene Edward Scott, II FORM 4 motion and affidavit for permission to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 08/08/2023. [12774727] (RL) [Entered: 08/15/2023 03:19 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Gene Edward Scott, II motion to volutarily dismiss appeal. Deficiencies: None. Served on 08/10/2023. [12774417] (RL) [Entered: 08/15/2023 11:30 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): A review of the record reflects that this appeal may be frivolous. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk will serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [12768401] (CKP) [Entered: 08/04/2023 01:43 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): Order to show cause docket fee due [12767214] (CKP) [Entered: 08/03/2023 09:14 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Gene Edward Scott II opening brief due 10/02/2023. [12766874] (JMR) [Entered: 08/02/2023 02:51 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
