Jane Wang v. City of Cupertino, et al
JOYCE FUNG, GREG LARSON, ALBERT SALVADOR, BEN FU, PAUL O'SULLIVAN, MONICA DIAZ, JEFFERY TRYBUS, CHRIS JENSEN and ARACELI ALEJANDRE |
JANE WANG |
CITY OF CUPERTINO and PHILLIP WILLKOMM |
23-16090 |
August 14, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Filed Appellant Jane Wang motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [12798495] (HH) [Entered: 09/25/2023 02:45 PM] |
Filing 3 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court. [12780638] (BJK) [Entered: 08/24/2023 04:38 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk: MCD: Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [12779683] (CKP) [Entered: 08/23/2023 02:05 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Jane Wang opening brief due 10/13/2023. Appellees City of Cupertino and Phillip Willkomm answering brief due 11/13/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12773363] (JMR) [Entered: 08/14/2023 11:11 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.