Aaron Zamora v. Arizona Board of Regents, et al
| AARON M. ZAMORA |
| ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS, a political subdivision of the state of Arizona, and Arizona State University, a public university and ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY |
| 23-16099 |
| August 16, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Americans w/Disabilities Act-Empl |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Streamlined request by Appellant Aaron M. Zamora to extend time to file the brief is not approved because it is unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed pending further order of this court. [12802519] (DR) [Entered: 10/02/2023 01:48 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (KENNETH K. LEE and LAWRENCE VANDYKE) : The August 14, 2023 notice of appeal was not filed within 30 days after the district courts entry of judgment on July 10, 2023. However, a review of the record reflects that on August 14, 2023, appellant filed a timely motion in the district court for an extension of time to appeal pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5). See 28 U.S.C. 2107(c); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)(A). The district court has not yet had an opportunity to rule on that motion. This appeal is remanded to the district court for the limited purpose of allowing that court to rule on appellants August 14, 2023 motion for an extension of time. The district court is requested to serve a copy of its decision on this court at its earliest convenience. Briefing is stayed pending further order of the court. If the district court grants the August 14, 2023 motion to extend time, appellant does not need to file a new notice of appeal. Briefing is stayed pending further order of this court. The Clerk will send a copy of this order to the district judge. [12802468] (RT) [Entered: 10/02/2023 01:15 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Aaron M. Zamora opening brief due 10/13/2023. Appellees Arizona Board of Regents and Arizona State University answering brief due 11/13/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12775065] (JMR) [Entered: 08/16/2023 10:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Aaron Zamora v. Arizona Board of Regents, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: AARON M. ZAMORA | |
| Represented By: | Aaron M. Zamora |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS, a political subdivision of the state of Arizona, and Arizona State University, a public university | |
| Represented By: | Rachel Remes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY | |
| Represented By: | Rachel Remes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
