Just Goods, Inc. v. Eat Just, Inc., et al
| JUST GOODS, INC., a Delaware corporation |
| EAT JUST, INC., FKA Hampton Creek, Inc., FKA Just, Inc. and JOSHUA TETRICK, an Individual |
| 23-16100 |
| August 16, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Trademark |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Filed order (KENNETH K. LEE and LAWRENCE VANDYKE): The motion to stay the district courts July 13, 2023 order (Docket Entry No. [ # 6 ]) is denied. See Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 434 (2009) (defining standard for stay pending appeal). The previously established briefing schedule remains in effect. [12799227] (AF) [Entered: 09/26/2023 01:48 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Appellants Joshua Tetrick and Eat Just, Inc. reply to response (). Date of service: 09/25/2023. [12798750] [23-16100] (Wang, Philip) [Entered: 09/25/2023 05:35 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellee Just Goods, Inc. response opposing motion ([ # 6 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 6 ] Motion (ECF Filing) motion to stay lower court action). Date of service: 09/22/2023. [12797598] [23-16100] (Bost, Paul) [Entered: 09/22/2023 04:43 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): The court has received appellants motion for a stay of the district courts July 13, 2023 order. Any response to the motion is due September 22, 2023. An optional reply is due September 25, 2023. [12795796] (AF) [Entered: 09/20/2023 01:28 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellants Eat Just, Inc. and Joshua Tetrick EMERGENCY Motion to stay lower court action. Date of service: 09/18/2023. [12794546] [23-16100] (Wang, Philip) [Entered: 09/18/2023 09:44 PM] |
| Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 08/29/2023. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12783180]. [23-16100] (AD) [Entered: 08/29/2023 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellants Eat Just, Inc. and Joshua Tetrick Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 08/29/2023. [12782737] [23-16100] (Wang, Philip) [Entered: 08/29/2023 01:10 PM] |
| Filing 3 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is released from the court's mediation program. Counsel may contact the Circuit Mediation Office at ca09_mediation@ca9.uscourts.gov to discuss services available through the Mediation Program or to request a settlement assessment conference. Information regarding the mediation program may be found at www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation.[12782558] (MS) [Entered: 08/29/2023 11:12 AM] |
| Filing 2 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellant has filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Within five (5) days of the filing date of this order, appellant shall file a Mediation Questionnaire or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. [12781012] (BLS) [Entered: 08/25/2023 12:28 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Eat Just, Inc. and Joshua Tetrick Mediation Questionnaire due on 08/23/2023. Transcript ordered by 09/12/2023. Transcript due 10/12/2023. Appellants Eat Just, Inc. and Joshua Tetrick opening brief due 11/22/2023. Appellee Just Goods, Inc. answering brief due 12/22/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12775108] (RT) [Entered: 08/16/2023 10:34 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
