Gloria Roman, et al v. Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc.
| GLORIA ROMAN, GERARDO VAZQUEZ and JUAN AGUILAR, and all others similarly situated |
| JAN-PRO FRANCHISING INTERNATIONAL, INC. |
| 23-16111 |
| August 22, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Labor Litigation |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): The briefing schedule previously set by the court is vacated. The Clerk is directed to temporarily close this courts docket for administrative purposes until February 1, 2024. This administrative closure is not a decision on the merits and no mandate will issue in connection with this order. At any time, any party may request that this appeal be reopened. On or before January 25, 2024, counsel are requested to contact the mediator Steven_Saltiel@ca9.uscourts.gov) to report on the status of the case. Counsel are requested to include the Ninth Circuit case name and number in the subject line. [12803775] (AF) [Entered: 10/03/2023 05:31 PM] |
| Filing 14 Filed order (BRIDGET S. BADE and LAWRENCE VANDYKE): Appellants motion for reconsideration of this courts September 12, 2023 order (Docket Entry No. [ # 11 ]) is denied. See 9th Cir. R. 27-10. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. [12801069] (AF) [Entered: 09/28/2023 04:54 PM] |
| Filing 13 MEDIATION STATUS REPORT DUE - 09/28/2023. See order for details. [12796659] (CL) [Entered: 09/21/2023 01:48 PM] |
| Filing 12 Filed (ECF) Appellees Juan Aguilar, Gloria Roman and Gerardo Vazquez response opposing motion ([ # 11 ] Motion for Reconsideration (ECF Filing)). Date of service: 09/15/2023. [12792931] [23-16111] (Liss-Riordan, Shannon) [Entered: 09/15/2023 09:29 AM] |
| Filing 11 Filed (ECF) Appellant Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc. motion for reconsideration of non-dispositive Judge Order of 09/14/2023. Date of service: 09/14/2023. [12792804] [23-16111] (Rahm, Richard) [Entered: 09/14/2023 06:28 PM] |
| Filing 10 Filed order (BRIDGET S. BADE and LAWRENCE VANDYKE): The motion to stay proceedings in the district court pending this appeal (Docket Entry No. [ # 2 ]) is denied without prejudice to renewing the arguments in the opening brief. The motion to expedite the appeal (Docket Entry No. [ # 8 ]) is granted. The opening brief and excerpts of record are due October 10, 2023; the answering brief is due November 7, 2023; and the optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. No streamlined extensions of time will be approved. See Ninth Circuit Rule 31-2.2(a)(1). No written motions for extensions of time under Ninth Circuit Rule 31-2.2(b) will be granted absent extraordinary and compelling circumstances. [12790711] (AF) [Entered: 09/12/2023 11:58 AM] |
| Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Appellant Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc. reply to response (). Date of service: 09/07/2023. [12788621] [23-16111] (Rahm, Richard) [Entered: 09/07/2023 06:57 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellees Juan Aguilar, Gloria Roman and Gerardo Vazquez EMERGENCY Motion to expedite case. Date of service: 09/05/2023. [12786974] [23-16111] (Liss-Riordan, Shannon) [Entered: 09/05/2023 08:45 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellees Juan Aguilar, Gloria Roman and Gerardo Vazquez response opposing motion ([ # 2 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 2 ] Motion (ECF Filing) motion to stay lower court action). Date of service: 09/05/2023. [12786973] [23-16111] (Liss-Riordan, Shannon) [Entered: 09/05/2023 08:42 PM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 09/21/2023, 10:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12784633] (CL) [Entered: 08/31/2023 01:55 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): The court has received the emergency motion to stay district court proceedings at Docket Entry No. [ # 2 ]. The response to the emergency motion is due September 5, 2023. The optional reply is due September 7, 2023. [12783414] (AF) [Entered: 08/30/2023 10:23 AM] |
| Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 08/29/2023. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12783177]. [23-16111] (AD) [Entered: 08/29/2023 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 08/29/2023. [12783166] [23-16111] (Rahm, Richard) [Entered: 08/29/2023 06:15 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc. EMERGENCY Motion to stay lower court action. Date of service: 08/28/2023. [12782266] [23-16111] (Rahm, Richard) [Entered: 08/28/2023 10:42 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire due on 08/29/2023. Transcript ordered by 09/20/2023. Transcript due 10/20/2023. Appellant Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc. opening brief due 11/29/2023. Appellees Juan Aguilar, Gloria Roman and Gerardo Vazquez answering brief due 12/29/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12778700] (JBS) [Entered: 08/22/2023 12:05 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
