Farid Shahrivar v. Rodney Rapson, et al
| FARID SHAHRIVAR |
| RODNEY RAPSON, an individual, DAVID SYKES, an individual, HARRY FREITAS, KATHERINE JENSEN, an individual, DAVID PRINTY, an individual, DANNY TSAO, KATRINA ALLEN, an individual, DOUG BAKER, an individual, ALEX GURZA, an individual, SARAH NUNES, an individual, LES WHITE, an individual, ALLEN DEMERS, an individual, RAJIV DAS, an individual, ADAM STREMPEL, an individual, STEVE PAGAN, an individual, ANGELA CHEN, an individual, MARK DANAJ, an individual, ROBERT FABELA, an individual, SUSAN LACY and CITY OF SAN JOSE, a municipality |
| 23-16131 |
| August 25, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Jobs |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| FARID SHAHRIVAR V. RODNEY RAPSON, ET ALSan Francisco District CourtCivilSilverman, Barry G., Smith, N. Randy, de Alba, Ana |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): When the notice of appeal was filed, a timely motion listed in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(4) was pending in the district court. Appellate proceedings are therefore held in abeyance until the district court decides the pending August 18, 2023 motion. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4); Leader Nat'l Ins. Co. v. Indus. Indem. Ins. Co., 19 F.3d 444, 445 (9th Cir. 1994) (notice of appeal becomes effective when timely tolling motions resolved). To challenge the district courts ruling on the motion, appellant must file an amended notice of appeal within the time set by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4. The Clerk will serve this order on the district court. [12812990] (CKP) [Entered: 10/20/2023 12:09 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Farid Shahrivar opening brief due 10/20/2023. Appellees Katrina Allen, Doug Baker, Angela Chen, City of San Jose, Mark Danaj, Rajiv Das, Allen Demers, Robert Fabela, Harry Freitas, Alex Gurza, Katherine Jensen, Susan Lacy, Sarah Nunes, Steve Pagan, David Printy, Rodney Rapson, Adam Strempel, David Sykes, Danny Tsao and Les White answering brief due 11/20/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12781188] (ABT) [Entered: 08/25/2023 02:53 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
