Joseph Cuviello v. City of Belmont, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOSEPH PATRICK CUVIELLO
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF BELMONT, AFSHIN OSKOUI, City of Belmont City Manager and BRIGITTE SHEARER, City of Belmont Parks and Recreation Director
Case Number: 23-16135
Filed: August 28, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 11, 2023 Filing 9 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): Appellees motion for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted (Docket Entry No.[ # 8 ]). The answering brief is due on December 22, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12807808] (WL) [Entered: 10/11/2023 09:21 AM]
October 9, 2023 Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellees City of Belmont, Afshin Oskoui and Brigitte Shearer Motion for miscellaneous relief [Motion for Extension of Time to file Answering Brief]. Date of service: 10/09/2023. [12806626] [23-16135] (Crawford, Sheila) [Entered: 10/09/2023 11:19 AM]
October 4, 2023 Filing 7 Received 3 paper copies of excerpts of record [ # 4 ] in 3 volume(s) and index volume filed by Mr. Joseph Patrick Cuviello. [12805186] (CPA) [Entered: 10/05/2023 11:31 AM]
October 4, 2023 Filing 6 Received 6 paper copies of Opening Brief [ # 3 ] filed by Mr. Joseph Patrick Cuviello. [12804787] (CPA) [Entered: 10/04/2023 04:12 PM]
September 27, 2023 Filing 5 Filed clerk order: The opening brief [ # 3 ] submitted by Mr. Joseph Patrick Cuviello is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: not applicable. The excerpts of record [ # 4 ] submitted by Mr. Joseph Patrick Cuviello are filed. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white covers. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12799717] (KT) [Entered: 09/27/2023 10:35 AM]
September 26, 2023 Filing 4 Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellant Mr. Joseph Patrick Cuviello. Date of service: 09/26/2023. [12799710]--[COURT ENTERED FILING to correct entry [ # 3 ].] (KT) [Entered: 09/27/2023 10:33 AM]
September 26, 2023 Filing 3 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Mr. Joseph Patrick Cuviello. Date of service: 09/26/2023. [12799562] [23-16135]--[COURT UPDATE: removed PDFs of excerpts of record, re-entered correctly in entry [ # 4 ]. 09/27/2023 by KT] (Cuviello, Joseph) [Entered: 09/26/2023 09:23 PM]
September 7, 2023 Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): The appeal filed August 25, 2023 is a preliminary injunction appeal. Accordingly, Ninth Circuit Rule 3 3 will apply. The briefing schedule is established as follows: appellants opening brief is due September 26, 2023; appellees answering brief is due October 24, 2023; and appellants optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. The appeal and any motions pending at the time briefing is completed will be referred to the next available motions panel for disposition. No streamlined extensions of time will be approved. See 9th Cir. R. 31 2.2(a)(3). Any request for an extension of time to file a brief must be made by written motion under Ninth Circuit Rule 31 2.2(b). Failure to file timely the opening brief will result in the automatic dismissal of this appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42 1. [12788099] (WL) [Entered: 09/07/2023 10:47 AM]
August 28, 2023 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: To be set. Preliminary Injunction Appeal, C.R. 3-3. [12782050] (JBS) [Entered: 08/28/2023 03:40 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Joseph Cuviello v. City of Belmont, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: JOSEPH PATRICK CUVIELLO
Represented By: Joseph Patrick Cuviello
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CITY OF BELMONT
Represented By: Sheila D. Crawford
Represented By: Richard W. Osman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: AFSHIN OSKOUI, City of Belmont City Manager
Represented By: Sheila D. Crawford
Represented By: Richard W. Osman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: BRIGITTE SHEARER, City of Belmont Parks and Recreation Director
Represented By: Sheila D. Crawford
Represented By: Richard W. Osman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?