Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
| ANTELOPE VALLEY AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT |
| UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and MICHAEL S. REGAN, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY |
| LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION and NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION |
| 23-1614 |
| July 28, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 28
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 27) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Opening Brief Due (Petitioner) due 12/20/2023, Opening Brief Due (Intervenor) due 1/19/2024, Answering Brief Due (Respondent) due 2/29/2024. Optional Reply Brief due 3/29/2024. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 11/14/2023 12:45 PM]
|
| Filing 27 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District. [Entered: 11/13/2023 04:55 PM] |
| Filing 26 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Mediation Conference Call, 11/16/2023, 11:00 am Pacific Time. [Entered: 11/09/2023 12:17 PM] |
| Filing 25 TERMINATED participation of Intervenor - Pending Northrop Grumman Corporation, Counsel for Intervenor - Pending Abbey Jane Hudson. [Entered: 10/16/2023 02:21 PM] |
|
Filing 24
ORDER FILED. Lockheed Martin Corporations motion (Docket Entry No. 20) to intervene on behalf of the petitioner is granted. The opening brief remains due November 20, 2023. The intervenor brief is due December 20, 2023. The answering brief is due January 30, 2024. The optional reply brief is due February 28, 2024. [Entered: 10/16/2023 01:58 PM]
|
| Filing 23 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Mediation Conference Call 11/9/2023, 11:00 am Pacific Time. Opening Brief Due 11/20/2023, Answering Brief Due 1/30/2024, Optional Reply Brief Due 2/28/2024. [Entered: 10/06/2023 11:33 AM] |
| Filing 22 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 10/6/2023, 10:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 09/28/2023 11:53 AM] |
| Filing 21 RESPONSE to Motion to Intervene (DE 20) filed by Respondent United States Environmental Protection Agency, Respondent Michael S. Regan. [Entered: 09/27/2023 02:18 PM] |
| Filing 20 MOTION to Intervene filed by Lockheed Martin Corporation. [Entered: 09/25/2023 03:58 PM] |
| Filing 19 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Intervenor - Pending Jesse Gessin representing Intervenor - Pending Lockheed Martin Corporation. [Entered: 09/21/2023 10:20 AM] |
| Filing 18 ADDED Counsel for Intervenor - Pending Kimberly L. Bick [Entered: 09/21/2023 10:19 AM] |
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Kimberly L. Bick for Intervenor - Pending Lockheed Martin Corporation replacing Jesse Gessin. [Entered: 09/21/2023 09:33 AM] |
|
Filing 16
ORDER FILED. The unopposed motions (Docket Entry Nos. 14 and 15) of Lockheed Martin Corporation and Northrop Grumman Corporation for an extension of time to file a motion to intervene are granted. Lockheed Martin Corporation and Northrop Grumman Corporations motions to intervene are due on or before September 25, 2023. Lockheed Martin Corporation and Northrop Grumman Corporations requests (included in Docket Entry Nos. 14 and 15) regarding mediation will be addressed by separate order. The opening brief remains due October 16, 2023. The answering brief is due November 15, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 09/14/2023 04:08 PM]
|
| Filing 15 MOTION to Extend Time to File Motion to Intervene and to Continue Mediation Assessment Conferencefiled by Northrop Grumman Corporation.--[Court entered filing to replace DE 10]--[Edited to update docket text to reflect content of filing] [Entered: 09/01/2023 11:16 AM] |
| Filing 13 ADDED Intervenor - Pending Lockheed Martin Corporation, with Counsel Jesse Gessin, Intervenor - Pending Northrop Grumman Corporation, with Counsel Abbey Jane Hudson. [Entered: 08/29/2023 02:45 PM] |
| Filing 12 ADDED Counsel for Petitioner Gregory Maestri [Entered: 08/29/2023 01:17 PM] |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Gregory Maestri for Petitioner Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District. [Entered: 08/29/2023 01:10 PM] |
| Filing 10 DEFECTIVE --- MOTION to Intervene filed by Northrop Grumman Corporation.--[Wrong filing type, correct entry is DE 15] [Entered: 08/28/2023 06:27 PM] [Edited: 09/01/2023 11:17 AM] |
| Filing 9 CERTIFIED LIST OF AGENCY RECORD filed by Respondent United States Environmental Protection Agency, Respondent Michael S. Regan. [Entered: 08/28/2023 04:32 PM] |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Extend Time to File Motion to Intervene and to Continue Mediation Assessment Conference filed by Lockheed Martin Corporation.--[Court entered filing to replace DE 8]--[Edited to update docket text to reflect content of filing] [Entered: 09/01/2023 11:12 AM] |
| Filing 8 DEFECTIVE --- MOTION to Intervene filed by Lockheed Martin Corporation.--[Wrong filing type, correct entry is DE 14] [Entered: 08/27/2023 04:01 PM] [Edited: 09/01/2023 11:13 AM] |
| Filing 7 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 9/6/2023, 1:30 p.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 08/11/2023 12:21 PM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Petitioner Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #ca09_mediation@ca9.uscourts.gov and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 08/02/2023 03:38 PM] |
| Filing 5 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Andrew J. Doyle [Entered: 07/31/2023 04:09 PM] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Andrew J. Doyle for Respondent Michael S. Regan, Respondent United States Environmental Protection Agency. [Entered: 07/31/2023 03:27 PM] |
| Filing 3 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due 8/4/2023, Petitioner Opening Brief due 10/16/2023, Respondent Answering Brief due 11/15/2023. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 07/28/2023 03:06 PM] |
| Filing 2 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 7/28/2023. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 23-1614 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 07/28/2023 03:04 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 07/28/2023 03:03 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
