Ralph Duran, et al v. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protect, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: RALPH DURAN and MICHAEL ESPARZA
Defendant / Appellee: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION, JOE TYLER, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES (CALHR) and ERAINA ORTEGA, in her official capacity as Director of the California Department of Human Resources
Case Number: 23-16155
Filed: September 6, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 25, 2023 Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [12798103] (CL) [Entered: 09/25/2023 10:41 AM]
September 13, 2023 Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 09/21/2023, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12791974] (CL) [Entered: 09/13/2023 05:40 PM]
September 13, 2023 Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 09/13/2023. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12791569]. [23-16155] (AD) [Entered: 09/13/2023 12:44 PM]
September 13, 2023 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellants Ralph Duran and Michael Esparza Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 09/13/2023. [12791393] [23-16155] (Taylor, Matthew) [Entered: 09/13/2023 10:24 AM]
September 6, 2023 Filing 2 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Ralph Duran and Michael Esparza Mediation Questionnaire due on 09/13/2023. Appellants Ralph Duran and Michael Esparza opening brief due 11/06/2023. Appellees California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, California Department of Human Resources (CalHR), Eraina Ortega and Joe Tyler answering brief due 12/04/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12787409] (ABT) [Entered: 09/06/2023 01:14 PM]
September 6, 2023 Filing 1 Deleted Incorrect Entry. Entered in error. [12787334] (ABT) [Entered: 09/06/2023 11:46 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ralph Duran, et al v. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protect, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: RALPH DURAN
Represented By: Gary M. Messing
Represented By: Matthew Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: MICHAEL ESPARZA
Represented By: Gary M. Messing
Represented By: Matthew Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION
Represented By: Paloma Carrero
Represented By: Lauren Elisabeth Powe
Represented By: Lauren Elisabeth Powe Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JOE TYLER, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection
Represented By: Paloma Carrero
Represented By: Lauren Elisabeth Powe
Represented By: Lauren Elisabeth Powe Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES (CALHR)
Represented By: Paloma Carrero
Represented By: Lauren Elisabeth Powe
Represented By: Lauren Elisabeth Powe Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ERAINA ORTEGA, in her official capacity as Director of the California Department of Human Resources
Represented By: Paloma Carrero
Represented By: Lauren Elisabeth Powe
Represented By: Lauren Elisabeth Powe Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?