Matthew Thomas v. BNSF Railway Company
Plaintiff / Appellant: MATTHEW THOMAS, an individual
Defendant / Appellee: BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, a Delaware corporation
Case Number: 23-16161
Filed: September 7, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Americans w/Disabilities Act-Empl
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 18, 2023 Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: Because appellants who are not represented by counsel are not required to file a Mediation Questionnaire, the courts order of October 6, 2023 is vacated. If counsel enters an appearance for appellant, he or she is requested to file a Mediation Questionnaire within 7 days of entry.[12811448] (MS) [Entered: 10/18/2023 09:44 AM]
October 11, 2023 Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Notice of withdrawal of counsel. Filed by Attorney Timothy F. Rosini for Appellant Matthew Thomas. Party proceeding without counsel: No. Party mailing address: 19627 W. Avalon Drive Buckeye, AZ 85396. Date of service: 10/11/2023. [12808304] [23-16161] (Rosini, Timothy) [Entered: 10/11/2023 04:12 PM]
October 11, 2023 Filing 5 Notice of Withdrawal of Csl (ECF Filing) [4] is rejected. Client's mailing address was not provided. Filer must refile notice and include client's address or file motion to withdraw. [12808291] (RL) [Entered: 10/11/2023 04:06 PM]
October 11, 2023 Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Notice of withdrawal of counsel. Filed by Attorney Timothy F. Rosini for Appellant Matthew Thomas. Party proceeding without counsel: No. Date of service: 10/11/2023. [12808225] [23-16161] (Rosini, Timothy) [Entered: 10/11/2023 03:16 PM]
October 6, 2023 Filing 3 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellant has filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Within five (5) days of the filing date of this order, appellant shall file a Mediation Questionnaire or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. [12806049] (BLS) [Entered: 10/06/2023 11:41 AM]
October 2, 2023 Filing 2 Terminated Unregistered Attorney Joshua Black for Matthew Thomas in 23-16161. Party has alternate counsel. [12802863] (SVG) [Entered: 10/02/2023 04:55 PM]
September 7, 2023 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Matthew Thomas Mediation Questionnaire due on 09/14/2023. Transcript ordered by 10/06/2023. Transcript due 11/06/2023. Appellant Matthew Thomas opening brief due 12/15/2023. Appellee BNSF Railway Company answering brief due 01/16/2024. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12788023] (ABT) [Entered: 09/07/2023 10:02 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Matthew Thomas v. BNSF Railway Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: MATTHEW THOMAS, an individual
Represented By: Joshua Black
Represented By: Timothy F. Rosini
Represented By: Matthew Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, a Delaware corporation
Represented By: William Chris Harrison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?