W. T. v. Douglas County School District
Plaintiff / Appellee: W. T., a minor, by and through Guardians ad Litem and individuals, C.P. and B.P.
Defendant / Appellant: DOUGLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Case Number: 23-16168
Filed: September 11, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 20, 2023 Filing 4 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): Appellants motion for voluntary dismissal of this appeal (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ]) is granted. This appeal is dismissed. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). This order served on the district court shall act as and for the mandate of this court. [12796089] (JBS) [Entered: 09/20/2023 03:41 PM]
September 15, 2023 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Douglas County School District Motion to dismiss the case. Date of service: 09/15/2023. [12793417] [23-16168] (Anderson, Paul) [Entered: 09/15/2023 03:02 PM]
September 14, 2023 Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD):A district court order is not appealable under 28 U.S.C. 1291 unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or unless judgment is entered in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). Romoland Sch. Dist. v. Inland Empire Energy Ctr., LLC, 548 F.3d 738, 747 (9th Cir. 2008) (citing Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981)); see also 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Digital Equip. Corp. v. Desktop Direct, Inc., 511 U.S. 863, 867 (1994) (observing that a decision is final under 1291 when it ends the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing more for the court to do but execute the judgment). This court may therefore lack jurisdiction over this appeal. Within 21 days, appellant must either file a statement explaining why the appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction or move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal under Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. If appellant files a statement, a response may be filed within 10 days. Briefing is stayed. [12792254] (JBS) [Entered: 09/14/2023 11:43 AM]
September 11, 2023 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Douglas County School District Mediation Questionnaire due on 09/18/2023. Transcript ordered by 10/10/2023. Transcript due 11/07/2023. Appellant Douglas County School District opening brief due 12/18/2023. Appellee W. T. answering brief due 01/16/2024. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12789688] (ABT) [Entered: 09/11/2023 11:34 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: W. T. v. Douglas County School District
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: W. T., a minor, by and through Guardians ad Litem and individuals, C.P. and B.P.
Represented By: Jean Murrell Adams
Represented By: Michelle R. Bumgarner Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: DOUGLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Represented By: Ann M. Alexander Esquire
Represented By: Paul J. Anderson Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?