Proofpoint, Inc., et al v. Vade Secure, Inc., et al
Defendant: OLIVIER LEMARIE
Plaintiff / Appellant: PROOFPOINT, INC. and CLOUDMARK, LLC
Defendant / Appellee: VADE SECURE, INC. and VADE SECURE, SASU
Case Number: 23-16175
Filed: September 12, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 24, 2023 Filing 13 Streamlined request [12] by Appellants Cloudmark, LLC and Proofpoint, Inc. in 23-16085, 23-16175 to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellants Cloudmark, LLC and Proofpoint, Inc. opening brief due 12/13/2023. Appellees Olivier Lemarie, Vade Secure, Inc. and Vade Secure, SASU answering brief due 01/12/2024. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12814731] [23-16085, 23-16175] (DR) [Entered: 10/24/2023 04:16 PM]
October 24, 2023 Filing 12 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellants Cloudmark, LLC and Proofpoint, Inc. in 23-16085, 23-16175. New requested due date is 12/13/2023. [12814656] [23-16085, 23-16175] (Adams, William) [Entered: 10/24/2023 02:56 PM]
October 24, 2023 Filing 11 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions. [12814476] [23-16085, 23-16175] (BLS) [Entered: 10/24/2023 11:19 AM]
October 20, 2023 Filing 10 MEDIATION CONFERENCE RESCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference, 10/23/2023, 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time (originally scheduled on 10/20/2023 ). [12812756] [23-16085, 23-16175] (BLS) [Entered: 10/20/2023 08:04 AM]
October 6, 2023 Filing 9 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): Appellants unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 12800683-1 ]) to consolidate is granted. Nos. 23-16085 and 23-16175 are consolidated. The consolidated opening brief is due November 13, 2023. The consolidated answering brief is due December 13, 2023. The optional consolidated reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the consolidated answering brief. [12805872] [23-16085, 23-16175] (JMR) [Entered: 10/06/2023 09:11 AM]
September 28, 2023 Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellants Cloudmark, LLC and Proofpoint, Inc. Unopposed Motion to consolidate cases No. 23-16085 and No. 23-16175. Date of service: 09/28/2023. [12800842] [23-16175] (Adams, William) [Entered: 09/28/2023 03:14 PM]
September 22, 2023 Filing 7 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference, 10/20/2023, 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time. See order for details. [12797647] [23-16085, 23-16175] (BLS) [Entered: 09/22/2023 07:43 PM]
September 19, 2023 Filing 6 Added Attorney(s) Jeffrey G. Homrig, Michael E. Bern for party(s) Appellee Vade Secure, Inc. and Appellee Vade Secure, SASU, in case 23-16175. [12795341] (QDL) [Entered: 09/19/2023 04:41 PM]
September 19, 2023 Filing 5 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Michael E. Bern (Latham & Watkins LLP, 555 Eleventh Street, NW Suite 1000, Washington, D.C. 20004-1304) for Appellees Vade Secure, Inc. and Vade Secure, SASU. Date of service: 09/19/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12795306] [23-16175] (Bern, Michael) [Entered: 09/19/2023 04:18 PM]
September 19, 2023 Filing 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Jeff Homrig (Latham & Watkins LLP, 300 Colorado St., Suite 2400, Austin, TX 78701) for Appellees Vade Secure, Inc. and Vade Secure, SASU. Date of service: 09/19/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12795300] [23-16175] (Homrig, Jeffrey) [Entered: 09/19/2023 04:15 PM]
September 19, 2023 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 09/19/2023. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12794991]. [23-16175] (AD) [Entered: 09/19/2023 12:44 PM]
September 19, 2023 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Cloudmark, LLC and Proofpoint, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 09/19/2023. [12794905] [23-16175] (Adams, William) [Entered: 09/19/2023 11:39 AM]
September 12, 2023 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Cloudmark, LLC and Proofpoint, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire due on 09/19/2023. Appellants Cloudmark, LLC and Proofpoint, Inc. opening brief due 11/13/2023. Appellees Vade Secure, Inc. and Vade Secure, SASU answering brief due 12/13/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12790914] (JBS) [Entered: 09/12/2023 02:43 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Proofpoint, Inc., et al v. Vade Secure, Inc., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: PROOFPOINT, INC.
Represented By: William Balden Adams
Represented By: Iman Lordgooei Esquire
Represented By: Sean S. Pak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: CLOUDMARK, LLC
Represented By: William Balden Adams
Represented By: Iman Lordgooei Esquire
Represented By: Sean S. Pak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: VADE SECURE, INC.
Represented By: Ryan Banks
Represented By: Sarang Damle
Represented By: Sadik Harry Huseny Esquire
Represented By: Joseph H. Lee
Represented By: Douglas Ethan Lumish
Represented By: Colin H. Murray Esquire
Represented By: Julianne Catherine Osborne
Represented By: Margaret Tough
Represented By: Holly Kathleen Victorson
Represented By: Joseph Wetzel
Represented By: Michael E. Bern
Represented By: Jeffrey G. Homrig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: VADE SECURE, SASU
Represented By: Ryan Banks
Represented By: Sarang Damle
Represented By: Sadik Harry Huseny Esquire
Represented By: Joseph H. Lee
Represented By: Douglas Ethan Lumish
Represented By: Colin H. Murray Esquire
Represented By: Julianne Catherine Osborne
Represented By: Margaret Tough
Represented By: Holly Kathleen Victorson
Represented By: Joseph Wetzel
Represented By: Michael E. Bern
Represented By: Jeffrey G. Homrig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OLIVIER LEMARIE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?