Raj Patel v. Alphabet, Inc., et al
| RAJ PATEL |
| ALPHABET, INC., GOOGLE, LLC and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, a Governmental Entity |
| 23-16181 |
| September 14, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Contract Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Filed (ECF) Appellant Raj Patel Correspondence: Default Judgement In Miss. Hinds Cir. Ct. $4.6-9B. Date of service: 10/29/2023 [12816770] [23-16181] (Patel, Raj) [Entered: 10/29/2023 06:43 AM] |
| Filing 13 Filed Appellant Raj Patel motion to file substitute or corrected brief. Deficiencies: None. Served on 10/22/2023. (Court entered filing, incorrectly filed in [ # 11 ] and [12].) [12813917] (KWG) [Entered: 10/23/2023 02:25 PM] |
| Filing 12 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 13 ] and [ # 11 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Appellant Raj Patel Correspondence: Second Am. Br.. Date of service: 10/22/2023 [12813460] [23-16181] (Patel, Raj) [Entered: 10/22/2023 01:48 AM] |
| Filing 11 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Raj Patel. Date of service: 10/21/2023. [12813455] [23-16181]--[COURT UPDATE: Removed PDF of the motion. See [ # 13 ]. 10/23/2023 by KWG] (Patel, Raj) [Entered: 10/21/2023 08:37 AM] |
| Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellant Raj Patel Correspondence: why appeal should go forward. Date of service: 10/12/2023 [12808420] [23-16181] (Patel, Raj) [Entered: 10/12/2023 07:37 AM] |
| Filing 9 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 10 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Appellant Raj Patel answer to Miscellaneous petition. Date of service: 10/11/2023. [12808260] [23-16181] (Patel, Raj) [Entered: 10/11/2023 03:47 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): A review of the record reflects that this appeal may be frivolous. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), OR (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not move to dismiss this appeal, the court may dismiss the appeal as frivolous, without further notice. Any determination of whether the appeal is frivolous will be based on the substitute opening brief received on September 19, 2023, and appellants statement, if any, in response to this order. The court has received appellants September 18, 2023 motion to file the brief under seal and the proposed brief. The Clerk will maintain the September 19, 2023 submissions (Docket Entry No. [4]) under provisional seal, and the motion to seal will be addressed by separate order. The Clerk will strike the prior opening brief previously submitted on September 15, 2023 (Docket Entry No. [2]). Appellants motions to expedite this appeal (Docket Entry Nos. [ # 6 ], [ # 7 ]) are denied. Briefing is suspended pending disposition of this order to show cause and the motion to seal. The Clerk will serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, or statement that the appeal should go forward. [12808209] (JMR) [Entered: 10/11/2023 03:07 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellant Raj Patel Amended EMERGENCY Motion to expedite case. Date of service: 10/02/2023. [12802021] [23-16181] --[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect correct ECF filing type. 10/02/2023 by TYL] (Patel, Raj) [Entered: 10/02/2023 05:02 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant Raj Patel Redacted Motion to expedite case. Date of service: 09/24/2023. [12797832] [23-16181] --[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect correct ECF filing type. 09/25/2023 by TYL] (Patel, Raj) [Entered: 09/24/2023 02:55 PM] |
| Filing 5 COURT DELETED DUPLICATE ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [4]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) UNDER SEAL Appellant Raj Patel motion to file document under seal and submit sealed document. Type of document: brief. Date of service: 09/20/2023. [12795491] [23-16181] (Patel, Raj) [Entered: 09/20/2023 08:57 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) UNDER SEAL Appellant Raj Patel motion to file document under seal and submit sealed document. Type of document: brief and motion (to file substitute brief). Date of service: 09/19/2023. [12794943] [23-16181]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached motion to seal, originally filed in [5]. Updated docket text to reflect correct document types. 09/20/2023 by KWG] (Patel, Raj) [Entered: 09/19/2023 12:05 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) UNDER SEAL Appellant Raj Patel notice of filing document under seal. Type of document: brief. Date of service: 09/18/2023. [12794067] [23-16181] (Patel, Raj) [Entered: 09/18/2023 01:05 PM] |
| Filing 2 STRICKEN PER ORDER [ # 8 ]. Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Raj Patel. Date of service: 09/15/2023. [12793133] [23-16181]--[COURT UPDATE: Locked PDF pending resolution of motion to seal. 09/20/2023 by KWG] (Patel, Raj) [Entered: 09/15/2023 11:41 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Raj K. Patel opening brief due 11/16/2023. Appellees Alphabet, Inc., Google, LLC and United States of America answering brief due 12/18/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12792213] (RT) [Entered: 09/14/2023 11:22 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
