Patrina Harrison v. City and County of San Francisco
Plaintiff / Appellant: PATRINA HARRISON
Defendant / Appellee: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Case Number: 23-16194
Filed: September 19, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 6, 2023 Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellee City and County of San Francisco response to Court order dated 11/06/2023. Date of service: 11/06/2023. [12820269] [23-16194] (Wiener, Aaron) [Entered: 11/06/2023 01:41 PM]
October 26, 2023 Filing 7 Filed Appellant Patrina Harrison letter dated 10/09/2023 that the appeal should go forward. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12816031] (BJK) [Entered: 10/26/2023 04:10 PM]
October 2, 2023 Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), OR (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not move to dismiss this appeal, the court may dismiss the appeal as frivolous, without further notice. Any determination of whether the appeal is frivolous will be based on the opening brief received on September 27, 2023, and appellants statement, if any, in response to this order. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellee may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk will serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, or statement that the appeal should go forward. [12802561] (CKP) [Entered: 10/02/2023 02:16 PM]
September 27, 2023 Filing 5 Filed Appellant Patrina Harrison motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 09/24/2023. [12800552] (BJK) [Entered: 09/28/2023 11:43 AM]
September 27, 2023 Filing 4 Filed original and 3 copies of Appellant Patrina Harrison opening brief of 5 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 09/25/2023. [12800110] (KWG) [Entered: 09/27/2023 02:59 PM]
September 25, 2023 Filing 3 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk: MCD: Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [12798356] (CKP) [Entered: 09/25/2023 01:23 PM]
September 25, 2023 Filing 2 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 23-16194: IFP] ). [12798354] (CKP) [Entered: 09/25/2023 01:20 PM]
September 19, 2023 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Patrina Harrison opening brief due 11/20/2023. Appellee City and County of San Francisco answering brief due 12/18/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12795119] (JMR) [Entered: 09/19/2023 02:35 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Patrina Harrison v. City and County of San Francisco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: PATRINA HARRISON
Represented By: Patrina Harrison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Represented By: Aaron Wiener
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?