Diaz-Diaz v. Garland
VALENTIN DIAZ-DIAZ |
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
23-1661 |
August 2, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 16 by Petitioner Valentin Diaz-Diaz received. [Entered: 11/13/2023 04:15 PM] |
Filing 18 ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 16 by Petitioner Valentin Diaz-Diaz is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 11/08/2023 04:18 PM] |
Filing 17 ORDER FILED. The motion for appointment of pro bono counsel (Docket Entry No. 4) is denied as unnecessary. The opening brief is due December 19, 2023. The answering brief is due January 18, 2024. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days of service of the answering brief. [Entered: 11/08/2023 02:28 PM] |
Filing 16 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Valentin Diaz-Diaz. [Entered: 11/06/2023 04:37 PM] |
Filing 15 ORDER FILED. The government has filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion for stay of removal. The temporary stay of removal continues until the mandate issues unless the court orders otherwise.See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c). [Entered: 09/15/2023 09:15 AM] |
Filing 14 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION to (DE 2) filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/14/2023 11:29 AM] |
Filing 13 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 08/24/2023 05:28 AM] |
Filing 12 MOTION to Stay Removal filed by Petitioner Valentin Diaz-Diaz. REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 08/14/2023 11:49 AM] |
Filing 11 ADDED Counsel for Petitioner Siovhan Sheridan Ayala [Entered: 08/07/2023 04:09 PM] |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Siovhan Sheridan Ayala for Petitioner Valentin Diaz-Diaz. [Entered: 08/07/2023 03:47 PM] |
Filing 9 ORDER FILED. Lisa B. Fitzgerald, Appellate Commissioner. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. 3) is granted. The Clerk will amend the docket to reflect this status. The certified administrative record remains due September 6, 2023. The response to the motion for a stay of removal remains due September 27, 2023. Briefing is stayed pending resolution of the motion for appointment of counsel. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. [Entered: 08/04/2023 03:23 PM] |
Filing 8 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Duncan T. Fulton for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/03/2023 07:55 AM] |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Duncan T. Fulton for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/03/2023 06:40 AM] |
Filing 6 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 9/6/2023, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 9/27/2023, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 11/6/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 1/4/2024. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 08/02/2023 03:20 PM] |
Filing 5 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 8/1/2023. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 23-1661 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 08/02/2023 03:17 PM] |
Filing 4 MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by . [Entered: 08/02/2023 03:17 PM] |
Filing 3 MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by . [Entered: 08/02/2023 03:17 PM] |
Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 08/02/2023 03:17 PM] |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 08/02/2023 03:17 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Diaz-Diaz v. Garland | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: VALENTIN DIAZ-DIAZ | |
Represented By: | Valentin Diaz-Diaz |
Represented By: | Ms. Siovhan Sheridan Ayala |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
Represented By: | Duncan T. Fulton |
Represented By: | Oil |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.