Avila-Avila, et al. v. Garland
Petitioner: MARIA GABRIELA AVILA-AVILA and LUIS JOSE AVILA-AVILA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 23-171
Filed: February 6, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2023 Filing 16 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Lynda Do for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 07/27/2023 07:35 AM]
July 27, 2023 Filing 15 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Lynda Do for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 07/27/2023 06:56 AM]
July 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER FILED. Pursuant to respondents unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 13), the Clerk will close this courts docket for administrative purposes until further order of the court. This order is not a decision on the merits and has no impact on any stay of removal. No mandate will issue, and at any time any party may request that this immigration petition be reopened, or the court may reopen the petition sua sponte. Within 14 days after a determination at the agency level that petitioner is eligible for discretionary relief, the parties are expected to file a motion to remand. The parties may request a referral to mediation at any time it might benefit the case. [Entered: 07/07/2023 04:59 PM]
June 7, 2023 Filing 13 MOTION to administratively close case filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/07/2023 09:18 AM]
May 11, 2023 Filing 12 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 11 by Petitioners is filed. Original and 7 copies. [Entered: 05/11/2023 11:21 AM]
May 10, 2023 Filing 11 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioners. [Entered: 05/11/2023 11:18 AM]
April 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER FILED. The government has filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion for stay of removal. The temporary stay of removal continues until the mandate issues unless the court orders otherwise. See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c). [Entered: 04/03/2023 12:32 PM]
March 31, 2023 Filing 9 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/31/2023 01:44 PM]
February 21, 2023 Filing 8 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Lindsay Marshall for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 02/21/2023 12:02 PM]
February 21, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Lindsay Marshall for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 02/21/2023 11:33 AM]
February 21, 2023 Filing 6 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 02/21/2023 05:45 AM]
February 7, 2023 Filing 5 FEE PAID by Petitioner(s). (Receipt #4709005683) [Entered: 02/07/2023 07:12 AM]
February 6, 2023 Filing 4 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 3/13/2023, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 4/3/2023, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 5/12/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 7/11/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 02/06/2023 02:58 PM]
February 6, 2023 Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 2/6/2023. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 23-171 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 02/06/2023 02:56 PM]
February 6, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 02/06/2023 02:55 PM]
February 6, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 02/06/2023 02:55 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Avila-Avila, et al. v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: MARIA GABRIELA AVILA-AVILA
Represented By: Maria Gabriela Avila-Avila
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: LUIS JOSE AVILA-AVILA
Represented By: Luis Jose Avila-Avila
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Lynda Do
Represented By: Lindsay Marshall
Represented By: Oil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?