Williams v. Chandler Police Department, et al.
Plaintiff / Appellant: TIMOTHY HUNTLEY WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee: CHANDLER POLICE DEPARTMENT, ROGER HARTSELL, MARICOPA COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE, MARICOPA COUNTY PROBATION OFFICE and STATE OF ARIZONA
Case Number: 23-1741
Filed: August 9, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2023 Filing 5 MAIL RETURNED. DE 4 addressed to Appellant Timothy Huntley Williams. Action taken: resending to ASPC - Phoenix, Inmate Workers, P.O. Box 52109, Phoenix, AZ 85072. [Entered: 11/02/2023 10:32 AM]
October 19, 2023 Filing 4 MANDATE ISSUED Bridget S. BADE, Kenneth K. LEE, Lawrence VANDYKE [Entered: 10/19/2023 08:57 AM]
September 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER FILED. (Bridget S. BADE, Kenneth K. LEE, Lawrence VANDYKE) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal, dated July 31, 2023 and filed on August 7, 2023, was not filed or delivered to prison officials within 30 days after the district courts judgment entered on June 14, 2023. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 2007) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [Entered: 09/27/2023 11:54 AM]
August 9, 2023 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal No RT Opening Brief Due 10/6/2023. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 08/09/2023 10:41 AM]
August 9, 2023 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:23-cv-00778-SPL--ESW has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 23-1741 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 08/09/2023 10:39 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Williams v. Chandler Police Department, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: TIMOTHY HUNTLEY WILLIAMS
Represented By: Timothy Huntley Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CHANDLER POLICE DEPARTMENT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ROGER HARTSELL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MARICOPA COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MARICOPA COUNTY PROBATION OFFICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: STATE OF ARIZONA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?