Mendoza Cordova v. Garland
Petitioner: OLMAN JAVIER MENDOZA CORDOVA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 23-183
Filed: February 8, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER FILED. Petitioners motion (Docket Entry No. 13) for voluntary dismissal of this petition for review is granted. The stay of appellate proceedings is lifted, and this petition is dismissed. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). This order served on the agency acts as and for the mandate of this court. [Entered: 09/01/2023 04:44 PM]
August 22, 2023 Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Petitioner Olman Javier Mendoza Cordova. [Entered: 08/22/2023 05:41 PM]
June 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER FILED. The stay of appellate proceedings ended on May 22, 2023 and no motion for further relief was filed. Within 14 days after the date of this order, the parties may file a motion for further relief. If no motion is filed, the stay of appellate proceedings will be lifted and the briefing schedule will be reset. [Entered: 06/06/2023 12:02 PM]
May 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER FILED. Respondents unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 8) to stay appellate proceedings is granted. The previously established briefing schedule is vacated. Appellate proceedings are stayed until May 22, 2023. If no motion for further relief is filed before this date, the briefing schedule will be reset in a future order. [Entered: 05/08/2023 06:37 PM]
April 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER FILED. The government did not timely respond to the motion for stay of removal. The absence of a response is treated as a statement of non-opposition; the temporary stay of removal continues until the mandate issues unless the court orders otherwise. See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c). [Entered: 04/10/2023 10:51 AM]
March 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER FILED. To proceed in this court, petitioner must pay a $500 filing fee or seek in forma pauperis status. If petitioner does not pay the fees or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis within 28 days of this order, the petition may be dismissed for failure to comply. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The Clerk will serve a Form 4 financial affidavit on petitioner. [Entered: 03/23/2023 03:07 PM]
March 23, 2023 Filing 8 MOTION to stay proceedings in this court filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/23/2023 05:42 AM]
March 13, 2023 Filing 7 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by Oil-Appellate Oil-Appellate. [Entered: 03/13/2023 08:40 AM]
February 9, 2023 Filing 6 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Kitty Marie Lees for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 02/09/2023 10:28 AM]
February 9, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Kitty Marie Lees for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 02/09/2023 05:40 AM]
February 8, 2023 Filing 4 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 3/15/2023, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 4/5/2023, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 5/15/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 7/13/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 02/08/2023 01:37 PM]
February 8, 2023 Filing 3 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 02/08/2023 01:35 PM]
February 8, 2023 Filing 2 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 2/8/2023. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 23-183 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 02/08/2023 01:31 PM]
February 8, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 02/08/2023 01:30 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Mendoza Cordova v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: OLMAN JAVIER MENDOZA CORDOVA
Represented By: Noreen Barcena
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Kitty Marie Lees
Represented By: OIL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?