Taylor v. Randall, et al.
Petitioner / Appellant: NIMROD B.H. TAYLOR
Respondent / Appellee: CHRISTOPHER RANDALL and SUNDQUIST
Case Number: 23-2273
Filed: September 15, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2023 Filing 5 MAIL RETURNED. DE 4 addressed to Appellant Nimrod B.H. Taylor. Action taken: none (no forwarding address found). [Entered: 11/07/2023 04:55 PM]
October 23, 2023 Filing 4 MANDATE ISSUED Bridget S. BADE, Kenneth K. LEE, Lawrence VANDYKE [Entered: 10/23/2023 10:26 AM]
September 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER FILED. (Bridget S. BADE, Kenneth K. LEE, Lawrence VANDYKE) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the August 25, 2023 order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983) (denial of appointment of counsel in a habeas proceeding is not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [Entered: 09/29/2023 01:45 PM]
September 15, 2023 Filing 2 COA SCHEDULE NOTICE. No COA order in district court. [Entered: 09/15/2023 03:53 PM]
September 15, 2023 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:23-cv-01039-AN has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 23-2273 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 09/15/2023 03:41 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Taylor v. Randall, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: NIMROD B.H. TAYLOR
Represented By: Nimrod B.H. Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: CHRISTOPHER RANDALL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: SUNDQUIST
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?