Rojas Sac v. Garland
OSCAR SANTIAGO ROJAS SAC |
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
23-2310 |
September 19, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER FILED. The government has filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion for stay of removal. The temporary stay of removal continues until the mandate issues unless the court orders otherwise. See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c). [Entered: 11/14/2023 02:01 PM] |
Filing 9 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION to Motion to Stay Removal (DE 2) filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 11/13/2023 11:44 AM] |
Filing 8 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 10/02/2023 09:01 AM] |
Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Taryn L. Arbeiter [Entered: 09/20/2023 09:49 AM] |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Taryn L. Arbeiter for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/20/2023 09:16 AM] |
Filing 5 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 10/24/2023, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 11/14/2023, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 12/26/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 2/21/2024. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 09/19/2023 03:32 PM] |
Filing 4 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 9/19/2023. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 23-2310 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 09/19/2023 03:29 PM] |
Filing 3 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner Oscar Santiago Rojas Sac. [Entered: 09/19/2023 03:28 PM] |
Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 09/19/2023 03:28 PM] |
Filing 1 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 8/25/2023. [Entered: 09/19/2023 03:28 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Rojas Sac v. Garland | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: OSCAR SANTIAGO ROJAS SAC | |
Represented By: | Ms. Carolina Gomez |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
Represented By: | Ms. Taryn L. Arbeiter |
Represented By: | Oil |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.