NetChoice, LLC v. Bonta
| NETCHOICE, LLC, doing business as NetChoice |
| ROB BONTA, Attorney General Of The State Of California |
| 23-2969 |
| October 23, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER FILED. Appellants unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 5) to amend the briefing schedule is granted. The opening brief is due December 13, 2023. The answering brief is due February 7, 2024. The optional reply brief is due March 13, 2024. [Entered: 11/14/2023 09:59 AM]
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Extend Time to File Opening Brief filed by Appellant Rob Bonta. [Entered: 11/01/2023 01:36 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Rob Bonta. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #ca09_mediation@ca9.uscourts.gov and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 10/27/2023 11:36 AM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. The appeal filed October 18, 2023, is a preliminary injunction appeal. Accordingly, Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3 shall apply. The mediation questionnaire is due three days after the date of this order. If they have not already done so, within 7 calendar days after the filing date of this order, the parties shall make arrangements to obtain from the court reporter an official transcript of proceedings in the district court that will be included in the record on appeal. The opening brief and excerpts of record are due no later than November 15, 2023. The answering brief is due December 13, 2023, or 28 days after service of the opening brief, whichever is earlier. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. See 9th Cir. R. 3-3(b). No streamlined extensions of time will be approved. See 9th Cir. R. 31-2.2(a)(3). Any request for an extension of time to file a brief must be made by written motion under Ninth Circuit Rule 31-2.2(b). Failure to file the opening brief timely will result in the automatic dismissal of this appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 10/25/2023 01:24 PM]
|
| Filing 2 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SCHEDULE NOTICE. Briefing will be set by future court order. See 9th Cir. R. 3-3 (regarding preliminary injunction appeals). [Entered: 10/23/2023 11:42 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 5:22-cv-08861-BLF has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 23-2969 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 10/23/2023 11:33 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
