Wanu v. Garland
| BRUNO VIBAN WANU |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 23-306 |
| March 6, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MAIL RETURNED. DE 14 addressed to Bruno Viban Wanu. Action taken: none (no forwarding address found). [Entered: 09/15/2023 03:02 PM] |
| Filing 14 MANDATE ISSUED Barry G. SILVERMAN, Ryan D. NELSON, Patrick J. BUMATAY [Entered: 08/21/2023 10:41 AM] |
| Filing 13 MAIL RETURNED. DE 12 addressed to Petitioner Bruno Viban Wanu. Action taken: none (petitioner was removed from U.S. on 04/25/2023 per DE 11, no forwarding address found). [Entered: 08/11/2023 02:12 PM] |
Filing 12
ORDER FILED. SILVERMAN, R. NELSON, and BUMATAY. This petition for review was improperly filed in the Ninth Circuit, because the immigration judge completed proceedings in the Sixth Circuit. See 8 U.S.C. 1252(b)(2) (The petition for review shall be filed with the court of appeals for the judicial circuit in which the immigration judge completed the proceedings.). We decline to transfer the petition to the Sixth Circuit because it is untimely. See 8 U.S.C. 1252(b)(1); Bibiano v. Lynch, 834 F.3d 966, 973-74 (9th Cir. 2016). The motion to dismiss this petition for lack of jurisdiction (Docket Entry No. 10) is granted. All other pending motions are denied as moot. PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. [Entered: 06/27/2023 03:45 PM] [Edited: 06/28/2023 10:05 AM]
|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE to Mail Returned (DE 9) filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/26/2023 08:09 AM] |
| Filing 10 MOTION to dismiss case filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/26/2023 08:08 AM] |
| Filing 9 MAIL RETURNED. Resending to: Respondent's counsel, Alexander Jacob Lutz, for forwarding. [Entered: 04/21/2023 04:45 PM] |
| Filing 8 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 04/03/2023 06:06 AM] |
| Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Alexander Jacob Lutz for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/06/2023 01:23 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Alexander Jacob Lutz for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/06/2023 12:55 PM] |
| Filing 5 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 4/10/2023, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 5/1/2023, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 6/9/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 8/8/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/06/2023 10:54 AM] |
| Filing 4 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 3/3/2023. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 23-306 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/06/2023 10:51 AM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 03/06/2023 10:51 AM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 03/06/2023 10:51 AM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 03/06/2023 10:50 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Wanu v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: BRUNO VIBAN WANU | |
| Represented By: | Bruno Viban Wanu |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Alexander Jacob Lutz |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
