United States of America v. Espinoza
Defendant / Appellant: AMILCAR DE JESUS ESPINOZA, Luis Martinez, Amilcar Jesus Espinoza, Johnnie Hernandez, Lucho Martines and Joe Martinez
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 23-320
Filed: March 7, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 25, 2024 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. ESPINOZA

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 1, 2023 Filing 30 Paper copies (6) of Reply Brief submitted at DE 25 by Appellant Amilcar De Jesus Espinoza received.(sent to panel) [Entered: 11/01/2023 03:44 PM]
October 30, 2023 Filing 29 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Michael L. Burke for Appellant Amilcar De Jesus Espinoza. Hearing in San Francisco - Courtroom 1 in San Francisco, on 1/10/2024 9:00:00 AM. Filer argument time: By myself. (Argument minutes: [-]). Special accommodations: I wish to appear in person. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. [Entered: 10/30/2023 02:07 PM]
October 30, 2023 Filing 28 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Monica Beerling Klapper for Appellee United States of America. Hearing in San Francisco - Courtroom 1 in San Francisco, on 1/10/2024 9:00:00 AM. Filer argument time: By myself. (Argument minutes: [-]). Special accommodations: I wish to appear in person. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. [Entered: 10/30/2023 01:44 PM]
October 29, 2023 Filing 27 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Wednesday, January 10, 2024 - 09:00 A.M. - Courtroom 1 - Scheduled Location: San Francisco CA View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case #here. NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you are expected to appear in person at the Courthouse. If an in person appearance would pose a hardship, you must file a motion for permission to appear remotely by video, using ACMS filing type Motion to Appear Remotely for Oral Argument. Such a motion must be filed within 7 days of this notice, absent exigent circumstances. Everyone appearing in person must review and comply with our Protocols for In Person Hearings, available #here. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you directly at least two weeks before the set argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for a remote appearance that has been approved or directed by the panel. Please note that if you do file a motion to appear remotely, the court strongly prefers video over telephone appearance. Therefore, if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to justify that request in your motion and receive explicit permission to do so. Be sure to review the #GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing. If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [23-320] [Entered: 10/29/2023 06:19 AM]
October 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER FILED. Reply Brief submitted at DE 25 by Appellant Amilcar De Jesus Espinoza is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellant must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with gray front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 10/26/2023 12:39 PM]
October 26, 2023 Filing 25 REPLY BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Amilcar De Jesus Espinoza. [Entered: 10/26/2023 10:16 AM]
September 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief for 30 days (DE 23) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Optional Reply Brief due 10/26/2023. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 09/21/2023 03:18 PM]
September 21, 2023 Filing 23 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief for 30 days filed by Appellant Amilcar De Jesus Espinoza. [Entered: 09/21/2023 03:06 PM]
September 20, 2023 Filing 22 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San Francisco. Please review the San Francisco sitting dates for January 2024 and the subsequent sitting month in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. Absent an irreconcilable conflict, the court expects you to appear and argue your case during one of these two months. If you have an irreconcilable conflict on any of the dates, please consult with opposing counsel to propose an alternate date and/or location and file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. [23-320] [Entered: 09/20/2023 03:41 PM]
September 7, 2023 Filing 21 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 19 by Appellee United States of America received. [Entered: 09/07/2023 03:07 PM]
September 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 19 by Appellee United States of America is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellee must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 09/05/2023 03:21 PM]
September 5, 2023 Filing 19 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 09/05/2023 10:53 AM]
July 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief for 30 days (DE 17) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due 9/5/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 07/12/2023 10:23 AM]
July 12, 2023 Filing 17 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file answering brief for 30 days filed by Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 07/12/2023 07:27 AM]
July 11, 2023 Filing 16 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellee John A. Ballos representing Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 07/11/2023 03:51 PM]
July 11, 2023 Filing 15 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Monica Beerling Klapper for Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 07/11/2023 03:50 PM]
July 11, 2023 Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Monica Beerling Klapper for Appellee United States of America replacing John A. Ballos. [Entered: 07/11/2023 03:48 PM]
July 7, 2023 Filing 13 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 8 by Appellant Amilcar De Jesus Espinoza received. [Entered: 07/07/2023 11:18 AM]
July 7, 2023 Filing 12 Paper copies (3) of Excerpts of Record in 1 Volume and Index Volume submitted at DE 9 by Appellant Amilcar De Jesus Espinoza received. [Entered: 07/07/2023 11:16 AM]
July 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 8 by Appellant Amilcar De Jesus Espinoza is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellant must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The excerpts of record submitted at DE 9 by Appellant Amilcar De Jesus Espinoza are filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellant must file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white front covers. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 07/05/2023 02:16 PM]
July 5, 2023 Filing 10 Presentence Report UNDER SEAL filed by Appellant Amilcar De Jesus Espinoza. [Entered: 07/05/2023 11:24 AM]
July 5, 2023 Filing 9 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant Amilcar De Jesus Espinoza. [Entered: 07/05/2023 11:22 AM]
July 5, 2023 Filing 8 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Amilcar De Jesus Espinoza. [Entered: 07/05/2023 11:12 AM]
May 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 6) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Opening Brief Due 7/5/2023, Answering Brief Due 8/4/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 05/30/2023 01:59 PM]
May 30, 2023 Filing 6 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Appellant Amilcar De Jesus Espinoza. [Entered: 05/30/2023 01:52 PM]
March 13, 2023 Filing 5 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellant Jared Heath Eggers representing Appellant Amilcar De Jesus Espinoza. [Entered: 03/13/2023 09:30 AM]
March 13, 2023 Filing 4 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Michael L. Burke for Appellant Amilcar De Jesus Espinoza. [Entered: 03/13/2023 09:28 AM]
March 13, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Michael L. Burke for Appellant Amilcar De Jesus Espinoza replacing Jared Heath Eggers. [Entered: 03/13/2023 08:41 AM]
March 7, 2023 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Sentence imposed: 24 Months. Appeal Transcript Order Due 3/27/2023, Appeal Transcript Due 4/26/2023, Appeal Opening Brief Due 6/5/2023, Appeal Answering Brief Due 7/5/2023. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule may result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 03/07/2023 10:59 AM]
March 7, 2023 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 23-320 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/07/2023 10:54 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: United States of America v. Espinoza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: AMILCAR DE JESUS ESPINOZA
Represented By: Mr. Michael L. Burke
Represented By: Jared Heath Eggers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: Luis Martinez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: Amilcar Jesus Espinoza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: Johnnie Hernandez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: Lucho Martines
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: Joe Martinez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Ms. Monica Beerling Klapper
Represented By: John A. Ballos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?