Charles Sampson, Sr. v. ODOC, et al
| CHARLES SAMPSON, Sr. |
| OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, an agency of the State of Oregon, REED PAULSON, JERRY BECKER, WILLIAM STRAUSS and WILLAMETTE SURGERY CENTER, LLC |
| 23-35045 |
| January 19, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| CHARLES SAMPSON, SR. V. ODOC, ET AL |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [12675025] (CL) [Entered: 03/15/2023 04:51 PM] |
| Filing 9 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference w/ counsel for appellee only, 03/15/2023, 1:30 p.m. Pacific Time. See order for details. [12666885] (CL) [Entered: 03/03/2023 01:14 PM] |
| Filing 8 Mail returned on 02/13/2023 addressed to Mr. John E. Pollino, re: [ # 1 ] Case Opening Information. Returned envelope notes: Return to sender, not deliverable as addressed, unable to forward. Resending to: case files; attorney is registered for CM/ECF electronic filing. [12653257] (JMR) [Entered: 02/14/2023 04:11 PM] |
| Filing 7 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 03/03/2023, 10:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12650358] (CL) [Entered: 02/09/2023 06:02 PM] |
| Filing 6 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 01/26/2023. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12640213]. [23-35045] (AD) [Entered: 01/26/2023 07:00 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Charles Sampson, Sr. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 01/26/2023. [12639707] [23-35045] (Burgess, John) [Entered: 01/26/2023 01:53 PM] |
| Filing 4 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court. [12636822] (JFF) [Entered: 01/24/2023 09:36 AM] |
| Filing 3 Attorneys Nathaniel Aggrey substituted by Attorneys Denise Gale Fjordbeck [12634980] (JFF) [Entered: 01/20/2023 02:03 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Denise G. Fjordbeck (Oregon Department of Justice - Appellate Division, 1162 Court Street NE, Salem, Oregon 97301) for Appellees Jerry Becker, ODOC, Reed Paulson and William Strauss. Substitution for Attorney Nathaniel Aggrey for Appellees Jerry Becker, ODOC, Reed Paulson and William Strauss. Date of service: 01/20/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12634801] [23-35045] (Fjordbeck, Denise) [Entered: 01/20/2023 12:01 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Charles Sampson Sr. Mediation Questionnaire due on 01/26/2023. Transcript ordered by 02/17/2023. Transcript due 03/20/2023. Appellant Charles Sampson Sr. opening brief due 04/28/2023. Appellees Jerry Becker, Oregon Department of Corrections, Reed Paulson, William Strauss and Willamette Surgery Center, LLC answering brief due 05/30/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12634163] (ABT) [Entered: 01/19/2023 02:51 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
