Jory Strizich v. Dustin Palmer
| JORY STRIZICH |
| DUSTIN PALMER |
| 23-35082 |
| February 1, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellant Jory Strizich response to Court order dated 02/01/2023. Date of service: 03/08/2023. [12669871] [23-35082] (Gunning, Benjamin) [Entered: 03/08/2023 02:23 PM] |
| Filing 7 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 02/14/2023. [12654885] (RT) [Entered: 02/16/2023 01:40 PM] |
| Filing 6 Added Attorney(s) Benjamin Gunning for party(s) Appellant Jory Strizich, in case 23-35082. [12654651] (BJK) [Entered: 02/16/2023 11:04 AM] |
| Filing 5 Added Attorney(s) Devi Rao for party(s) Appellant Jory Strizich, in case 23-35082. [12654122] (BJK) [Entered: 02/15/2023 04:41 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Devi M. Rao (MacArthur Justice Center, 501 H St. NE, Suite 275, Washington, DC 20002) for Appellant Jory Strizich. Date of service: 02/14/2023. (Party was previously proceeding pro se.) [12652879] [23-35082] (Rao, Devi) [Entered: 02/14/2023 01:18 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Benjamin Thomas Gunning (MacArthur Justice Center, 501 H St. NE, Suite 275, Washington, DC 20002) for Appellant Jory Strizich. Date of service: 02/14/2023. (Party was previously proceeding pro se.) [12652877] [23-35082] (Gunning, Benjamin) [Entered: 02/14/2023 01:17 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellee may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [12644317] (CKP) [Entered: 02/01/2023 03:57 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Jory Strizich opening brief due 04/03/2023. Appellee Dustin Palmer answering brief due 05/01/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12643845] (ABT) [Entered: 02/01/2023 10:50 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Jory Strizich v. Dustin Palmer | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: JORY STRIZICH | |
| Represented By: | Jory Strizich |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Gunning |
| Represented By: | Devi Rao |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: DUSTIN PALMER | |
| Represented By: | Rebecca Narmore |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
