Jess Smith v. Ellis, et al
| JESS RICHARD SMITH |
| ELLIS, Sgt., C.U.S. JONES, THOMAS L'HEUREUX, MICHAEL WAYMAN, J AMSBURY, D DHANE, K MCTARSNEY, MCGINNIS, C.O. and M. BRANDT |
| 23-35085 |
| February 2, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: CKP) Granting Motion to dismiss the case pursuant to rule 42b filed by Appellant Jess Richard Smith. This order shall constitute the mandate. [12657687] (CKP) [Entered: 02/21/2023 03:30 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Jess Richard Smith motion to dismiss the appeal. Deficiencies: None. Served on 02/13/2023. [12657034] (BJK) [Entered: 02/21/2023 11:14 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Jess Richard Smith letter dated 02/07/2023 re:party listing in caption. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12653268] (BJK) [Entered: 02/14/2023 04:19 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12648223] (CKP) [Entered: 02/07/2023 02:15 PM] |
| Filing 2 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 23-35085: Due] ). [12648218] (CKP) [Entered: 02/07/2023 02:13 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Jess Richard Smith opening brief due 04/03/2023. Appellees J Amsbury, M. Brandt, D Dhane, Ellis, C.U.S. Jones, Thomas L'heureux, McGinnis, K McTarsney and Michael Wayman answering brief due 05/02/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12644816] (ABT) [Entered: 02/02/2023 11:58 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
