Kenneth Hunt v. State of Oregon
| KENNETH ERIC HUNT |
| STATE OF OREGON |
| 23-35095 |
| February 6, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant Kenneth Eric Hunt letter dated 03/27/2023 re: Notice of Appeal by Right. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12687784] (BJK) [Entered: 04/03/2023 02:33 PM] |
| Filing 6 Received copy of District Court order filed on 03/10/2023 denying the certificate of appealability. [12674794] (BJK) [Entered: 03/15/2023 02:30 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed original and 0 copies of Appellant Kenneth Eric Hunt opening brief of 18 pages (Informal: No). Served on 02/27/2023. [12672865]--[COURT UPDATE: updated docket text to remove note. 03/15/2023 by KT] (KT) [Entered: 03/13/2023 01:40 PM] |
| Filing 4 Deleted Incorrect Entry. Entered in error. [12672665] (BJK) [Entered: 03/13/2023 12:02 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner): This case appears to arise from the district courts January 26, 2023 post-judgment order denying appellants motion for reconsideration in habeas corpus proceedings under 28 U.S.C. 2254, and thus is subject to the requirements of 28 U.S.C. 2253(c). See Lynch v. Blodgett, 999 F.2d 401, 403 (9th Cir. 1993) (certificate of probable cause to appeal necessary to appeal denial of post-judgment motion for relief under Rule 60(b)). This case is remanded to the district court for the limited purpose of granting or denying a certificate of appealability with respect to the January 26, 2023 post-judgment order at the courts earliest convenience. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); United States v. Asrar, 116 F.3d 1268, 1270 (9th Cir. 1997). If the district court chooses to issue a certificate of appealability, the court should specify the issues that meet the required showing; if the district court declines to issue a certificate, the court is requested to state its reasons. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(3); Asrar, 116 F.3d at 1270. The Clerk will send a copy of this order to the district court. (Pro Se) [12663090] (CKP) [Entered: 02/27/2023 04:39 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Kenneth Eric Hunt letter dated 01/30/2023 re:.Interlocutory Appeal, objection of challenge to the court's jurisdiction and their objection to affidavit of specific negative averment in violation of well established law. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12648876] (BJK) [Entered: 02/08/2023 11:10 AM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 11/30/2022. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12646700] (JMR) [Entered: 02/06/2023 09:44 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Kenneth Hunt v. State of Oregon | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: KENNETH ERIC HUNT | |
| Represented By: | Kenneth Eric Hunt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: STATE OF OREGON | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
