Nicholas DeFries v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff / Appellant: NICHOLAS DEFRIES
Defendant / Appellee: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a Delaware corporation
Case Number: 23-35119
Filed: February 15, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Americans w/Disabilities Act-Empl
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 17, 2023 Filing 13 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: SSR): Appellants motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 5 ]) to consolidate is denied. Nos. 22-16847, 22-16849, and 23-35119 shall proceed separately but will be calendared before the same panel that will consider the merits of these appeals. The opening brief remains due May 24, 2023. The answering brief is due June 23, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12676183] (AF) [Entered: 03/17/2023 10:58 AM]
March 15, 2023 Filing 12 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [12674649] (CL) [Entered: 03/15/2023 12:40 PM]
March 14, 2023 Filing 11 Filed (ECF) Appellant Nicholas DeFries Correspondence: Plaintiff-Appellant's certification of transcript order form. Date of service: 03/14/2023 [12673840] [23-35119] (Wessler, Matthew) [Entered: 03/14/2023 01:18 PM]
March 1, 2023 Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellant Nicholas DeFries reply to response (motion to consolidate cases). Date of service: 03/01/2023. [12664538] [23-35119] (Wessler, Matthew) [Entered: 03/01/2023 09:16 AM]
February 28, 2023 Filing 9 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 03/14/2023, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12663720] (CL) [Entered: 02/28/2023 12:28 PM]
February 27, 2023 Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellee Union Pacific Railroad Company response opposing motion ([ # 5 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 5 ] Motion (ECF Filing)). Date of service: 02/27/2023. [12662940] [23-35119] (Walsh, William) [Entered: 02/27/2023 03:35 PM]
February 22, 2023 Filing 7 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 02/22/2023. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12658741]. [23-35119] (AD) [Entered: 02/22/2023 12:44 PM]
February 22, 2023 Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant Nicholas DeFries Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 02/22/2023. [12658738] [23-35119] (Kaster, Lucas) [Entered: 02/22/2023 12:39 PM]
February 15, 2023 Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Nicholas DeFries Motion to consolidate cases 22-16847, 22-16849, & 23-35119. Date of service: 02/15/2023. [12654153] [23-35119] (Wessler, Matthew) [Entered: 02/15/2023 04:56 PM]
February 15, 2023 Filing 4 Added Attorneys Matthew W.H. Wessler and Jessica Garland for Appellant Nicholas DeFries, in case 23-35119. [12654118] (HH) [Entered: 02/15/2023 04:40 PM]
February 15, 2023 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Jessica Garland (Gupta Wessler PLLC, 100 Pine Street, Suite 1250, San Francisco, CA 94111) for Appellant Nicholas DeFries. Date of service: 02/15/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12654052] [23-35119] (Garland, Jessica) [Entered: 02/15/2023 04:01 PM]
February 15, 2023 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Matthew W.H. Wessler (Gupta Wessler PLLC, 2001 K Street NW, Suite 850 North, Washington, DC 20006) for Appellant Nicholas DeFries. Date of service: 02/15/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12654049] [23-35119] (Wessler, Matthew) [Entered: 02/15/2023 03:59 PM]
February 15, 2023 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Nicholas DeFries Mediation Questionnaire due on 02/22/2023. Transcript ordered by 03/15/2023. Transcript due 04/14/2023. Appellant Nicholas DeFries opening brief due 05/24/2023. Appellee Union Pacific Railroad Company answering brief due 06/23/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12653892] (JBS) [Entered: 02/15/2023 02:04 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Nicholas DeFries v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: NICHOLAS DEFRIES
Represented By: Lucas Kaster
Represented By: Anthony S. Petru
Represented By: Jessica Garland
Represented By: James Harvey Kaster
Represented By: Matthew W.H. Wessler
Represented By: Gavin Scott Barney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a Delaware corporation
Represented By: William Walsh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?