Henry Umouyo, et al v. Bank of America, NA, et al
ANIEDI H. UMOUYO |
HENRY A. UMOUYO |
BANK OF AMERICA, NA, CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC, AZTEC FORECLOSURE CORPORATION, of Washington and UNKNOWN HEIRS, devisees, grantees, creditors, and other unknown spouses claimimg by, through and under Bank of America, NA |
23-35142 |
February 27, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other Real Property Actions |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Henry A. Umouyo Motion to take judicial notice of Court Hearing Transcript, State Court Order of Dismissal, BANA's Motion for Summary Judgement and BANA's Motion for Order of Dismissal.. Date of service: 04/26/2023. [12703871] [23-35142] (Umouyo, Henry) [Entered: 04/26/2023 05:29 PM] |
Filing 3 Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellant Henry A. Umouyo. Date of service: 04/26/2023. [12703821] [23-35142] (Umouyo, Henry) [Entered: 04/26/2023 04:43 PM] |
Filing 2 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Henry A. Umouyo. Date of service: 04/26/2023. [12703808] [23-35142] (Umouyo, Henry) [Entered: 04/26/2023 04:34 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Henry A. Umouyo opening brief due 04/28/2023. Appellees Aztec Foreclosure Corporation, Bank of America, NA, Carrington Mortgage Services LLC and Unknown Heirs answering brief due 05/30/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12662673] (RT) [Entered: 02/27/2023 02:16 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.