Bryce Jackson v. State of Washington
| BRYCE JACKSON |
| STATE OF WASHINGTON |
| 23-35173 |
| March 13, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant Bryce Jackson response to order to show cause dated 04/13/2023. [12702917] (QDL) [Entered: 04/25/2023 04:14 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AT): A review of the record reflects that this appeal may be frivolous. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), OR (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not move to dismiss this appeal, the court may dismiss the appeal as frivolous, without further notice. Any determination of whether the appeal is frivolous will be based on the opening brief received on March 30, 2023, the supplemental brief received on April 6, 2023, and appellants statement, if any, in response to this order. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The briefing schedule for this appeal remains stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss this appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [12694979] (JBS) [Entered: 04/13/2023 11:22 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed original and 0 copies of Appellant Bryce Jackson supplemental brief of 2 pages (Informal: No). Served on 04/01/2023. (motion for IFP pending, briefing remains stayed) [12690731] (KWG) [Entered: 04/06/2023 03:10 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Bryce Jackson motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [12686053] (QDL) [Entered: 03/30/2023 04:09 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed original and 0 copies of Appellant Bryce Jackson opening brief of 6 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 03/15/2023. Filed with minor deficiencies: fee due, motion for IFP pending. (briefing remains stayed, motion for IFP pending) [12685934] (KWG) [Entered: 03/30/2023 02:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12673900] (CKP) [Entered: 03/14/2023 01:55 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Bryce Jackson opening brief due 05/08/2023. [12672594] (ABT) [Entered: 03/13/2023 11:38 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Bryce Jackson v. State of Washington | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: BRYCE JACKSON | |
| Represented By: | Bryce Jackson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: STATE OF WASHINGTON | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
