Lacey Sivak v. State of Idaho, et al
LACEY MARK SIVAK |
STATE OF IDAHO, CYNTHIA CRAIG MARTINEZ, KRISTINA WALDRAM, RANDY VALLEY and JEFFREY TERRAROSA |
23-35190 |
March 16, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Filed Appellant Lacey Mark Sivak letter dated 04/21/2023 requesting copy of the docket. Sent copy. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12705384] (BJK) [Entered: 04/28/2023 04:33 PM] |
Filing 6 Filed Appellant Lacey Mark Sivak Form 4 motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 04/01/2023. [12692205] (BJK) [Entered: 04/10/2023 11:26 AM] |
Filing 5 Filed Appellant Lacey Mark Sivak motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/31/2023. [12692197] (BJK) [Entered: 04/10/2023 11:24 AM] |
Filing 4 Filed original and 0 copies of Appellant Lacey Mark Sivak opening brief of 12 pages (Informal: No). Served on 03/23/2023. (motion for IFP pending, briefing remains stayed) [12683943] (KWG) [Entered: 03/28/2023 03:58 PM] |
Filing 3 Filed Appellant Lacey Mark Sivak motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/23/2023. [12683890] (BJK) [Entered: 03/28/2023 03:23 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12681706] (CKP) [Entered: 03/24/2023 04:30 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Lacey Mark Sivak opening brief due 05/12/2023. [12675650] (JMR) [Entered: 03/16/2023 03:01 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.