Jonathan Dillard v. Stanley Bastin, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: JONATHAN DILLARD
Defendant / Appellee: STANLEY BASTIN, Judge, JOHN DOE, Ada County Sheriff-Sergeant in charge, COLIN STARRY and CRYSTAL LALEMAN
Case Number: 23-35199
Filed: March 21, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 15, 2023 Filing 11 Filed Appellant Jonathan Dillard motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 05/08/2023. [12717180] (BJK) [Entered: 05/16/2023 04:41 PM]
May 15, 2023 Filing 10 Filed Appellant Jonathan Dillard motion to follow the bill of 2009 and case law for proper procedures. Deficiencies: None. Served on 05/08/2023. [12717033] (BJK) [Entered: 05/16/2023 02:45 PM]
May 15, 2023 Filing 9 Filed Appellant Jonathan Dillard motion to extend time to comply with the order dated 03/21/2023. Deficiencies: None. Served on 05/09/2023. [12717027] (BJK) [Entered: 05/16/2023 02:42 PM]
May 15, 2023 Filing 8 Filed Appellant Jonathan Dillard motion to extend time to comply with the order. Deficiencies: None. Served on 05/08/2023. [12717015] (BJK) [Entered: 05/16/2023 02:37 PM]
May 15, 2023 Filing 7 Filed Appellant Jonathan Dillard motion to extend time to comply with the order dated 03/21/2023. Deficiencies: None. Served on 05/08/2023. [12717005] (BJK) [Entered: 05/16/2023 02:34 PM]
April 26, 2023 Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AC): A review of the record reflects that this appeal may be frivolous. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), OR (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. The briefing schedule for this appeal remains stayed pending resolution of the motions to proceed in forma pauperis and for the appointment of counsel. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. The motion for an extension of time to file the opening brief (Docket Entry No. [ # 4 ] ) is denied as unnecessary. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss this appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [12703766] (RT) [Entered: 04/26/2023 04:08 PM]
April 11, 2023 Filing 5 Streamlined request by Appellant Jonathan Dillard to extend time to file the brief is not approved because it is unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. [12693500] (DR) [Entered: 04/11/2023 01:20 PM]
April 10, 2023 Filing 4 Filed Appellant Jonathan Dillard motion to extend time to file appellant opening brief. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/29/2023. [12693381] (BJK) [Entered: 04/11/2023 11:55 AM]
April 4, 2023 Filing 3 Filed Appellant Jonathan Dillard motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/29/2023. [12689444] (BJK) [Entered: 04/05/2023 10:12 AM]
April 4, 2023 Filing 2 Filed Appellant Jonathan Dillard motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/29/2023. [12689412] (BJK) [Entered: 04/05/2023 10:01 AM]
March 21, 2023 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES.. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Jonathan Dillard opening brief due 05/19/2023. [12678839] (JMR) [Entered: 03/21/2023 03:23 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Jonathan Dillard v. Stanley Bastin, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: JONATHAN DILLARD
Represented By: Jonathan Dillard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: STANLEY BASTIN, Judge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JOHN DOE, Ada County Sheriff-Sergeant in charge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: COLIN STARRY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CRYSTAL LALEMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?