Daniel Griffin v. Jason Bennett, et al
Respondent: ROBERT FERGUSON
Petitioner / Appellant: DANIEL RYAN GRIFFIN
Respondent / Appellee: RONALD HAYNES, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center and JASON BENNETT, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center
Case Number: 23-35221
Filed: March 30, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 23, 2023 Filing 7 Filed Appellant Daniel Ryan Griffin motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 05/17/2023. [12721334] (HH) [Entered: 05/23/2023 03:05 PM]
May 5, 2023 Filing 6 Sent Appellant a copy of the docket sheet, the FRAP and Ninth Circuit rules and a copy of Form 4 in response to the letter filed on 04/14/2023. [12709692] (JR) [Entered: 05/05/2023 10:33 AM]
May 5, 2023 Filing 5 Appellee Ronald Haynes in 23-35221 substituted by Appellee Jason Bennett in 23-35221 [12709538] (TYL) [Entered: 05/05/2023 09:04 AM]
April 14, 2023 Filing 4 Filed Appellant Daniel Ryan Griffin letter dated 04/10/2023 re: Question regarding party listing. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12696192] (HH) [Entered: 04/14/2023 04:46 PM]
April 5, 2023 Filing 3 Attorney Christopher Mark Fowler substituted by Attorney C. Mark Fowler in 23-35221. [12689372] (HH) [Entered: 04/05/2023 09:50 AM]
April 5, 2023 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of C. Mark Fowler (Attorney General of Washington, Corrections Division, P.O. Box 40116, Olympia, WA 98504) for Appellee Ronald Haynes. Substitution for Attorney Christopher Mark Fowler, Esquire for Appellee Ronald Haynes. Date of service: 04/05/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12689225] [23-35221] (Fowler, C. Mark) [Entered: 04/05/2023 08:30 AM]
March 30, 2023 Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 01/27/2023. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12685440] (JMR) [Entered: 03/30/2023 09:38 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Daniel Griffin v. Jason Bennett, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: DANIEL RYAN GRIFFIN
Represented By: Daniel Ryan Griffin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ROBERT FERGUSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: RONALD HAYNES, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center
Represented By: Christopher Mark Fowler Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: JASON BENNETT, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center
Represented By: C. Mark Fowler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?