Ernesto Carinio v. Earl Houser
Petitioner / Appellant: ERNESTO CARINIO
Respondent / Appellee: EARL HOUSER, State of Alaska Dept of Correction Superintendent III
Case Number: 23-35237
Filed: April 7, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 14, 2023 Filing 2 Filed Appellant Ernesto Carinio letter dated re: AFFIDAVIT. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12696525] (JFF) [Entered: 04/17/2023 10:03 AM]
April 7, 2023 Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 03/16/2023. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12691371] (OC) [Entered: 04/07/2023 01:11 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ernesto Carinio v. Earl Houser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: ERNESTO CARINIO
Represented By: Ernesto Carinio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: EARL HOUSER, State of Alaska Dept of Correction Superintendent III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?